Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 232 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mooij Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mooij Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mooij Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mooij Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 19:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 19:45 | 01:16:08 to 56:23 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:12 to 08:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:04 to 08:04 | 0.0% |
| Mooij Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 05:50 -01:13 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 04:37 | 05:01 -00:18 | 05:50 -01:13 |
| Running 2 | 09:02 | 09:20 | 06:44 +02:18 | 10:51 -01:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 18:22 | 04:14 -00:43 | 17:35 +00:47 |
| Running 3 | 09:41 | 21:53 | 07:31 +02:10 | 21:49 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 31:34 | 07:42 -01:53 | 29:20 +02:14 |
| Running 4 | 09:50 | 37:23 | 07:35 +02:15 | 37:02 +00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:12 | 47:13 | 09:01 -00:49 | 44:37 +02:36 |
| Running 5 | 11:33 | 55:25 | 07:54 +03:39 | 53:38 +01:47 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 01:06:58 | 05:39 -00:17 | 01:01:32 +05:26 |
| Running 6 | 09:46 | 01:12:20 | 07:40 +02:06 | 01:07:11 +05:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 01:22:06 | 03:06 -01:07 | 01:14:51 +07:15 |
| Running 7 | 09:36 | 01:24:05 | 07:37 +01:59 | 01:17:57 +06:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 01:33:41 | 08:31 -03:30 | 01:25:34 +08:07 |
| Running 8 | 12:06 | 01:38:42 | 10:00 +02:06 | 01:34:05 +04:37 |
| Wall Balls | 08:04 | 01:50:48 | 11:30 -03:26 | 01:44:05 +06:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:35 | 02:07:19 | 11:44 -03:09 | 02:07:19 |
Nick's total running time of 01:16:08 was 18:00 slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in his running abilities. However, his best running lap time of 00:04:37 was 00:53 faster than average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in this area with the right training.
To improve his running performance, Nick should focus on increasing his overall fitness and reducing his transition time. Incorporating high-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts, such as sprints and hill repeats, can help improve his speed and endurance. Additionally, including strength training exercises like squats, lunges, and plyometric exercises can enhance his running performance by improving his leg strength and power.
To specifically address the areas where he lost the most time, Nick should consider the following training strategies and techniques:
1. Running 5: Nick was 03:47 slower than average in this segment. To improve his performance, he can incorporate longer distance runs into his training regimen, gradually increasing the distance over time. Interval training, such as alternating between sprinting and jogging, can also help improve his speed and endurance.
2. Running 2: Nick was 02:32 slower than average in this segment. He can work on improving his running form and technique by focusing on maintaining a proper stride length and cadence. Incorporating drills like high knees, butt kicks, and bounding exercises can help improve his running efficiency.
3. Running 4: Nick was 02:26 slower than average in this segment. To enhance his performance, he can incorporate tempo runs into his training routine. Tempo runs involve running at a challenging, but sustainable pace for a set distance or time. This will help improve his speed endurance and pacing.
4. Running 6: Nick was 02:13 slower than average in this segment. He can focus on improving his running economy by incorporating hill training into his workouts. Running uphill forces the body to work harder, which can improve his overall running efficiency and strength.
5. Running 3, Running 8, Running 7: Nick was 02:09, 02:06, and 02:03 slower than average in these segments, respectively. To improve his performance, he can incorporate interval training with varying speeds and distances. This can help improve his ability to sustain faster paces and recover quickly during races.
In conclusion, Nick Mooij performed well in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance in future races. By focusing on his running abilities, incorporating specific training strategies, and implementing efficient race strategies, he can work towards achieving better results and reaching his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Burlage Jasper | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:07:09 | |
| Hansen Jacob Asp | 2024 Copenhagen | 02:06:58 | |
| Carolina JuliusCarl | 2024 Rotterdam | 02:07:49 | |
| Bayer Tomas | 2023 Barcelona | 02:07:01 | |
| Müller Björn | 2024 Hamburg | 02:07:32 | |
| Enderle Stefan | 2022 Wien | 02:07:36 | |
| Reynolds Philip | 2024 Manchester | 02:07:27 | |
| Blencowe Joshua | 2024 Melbourne | 02:07:07 | |
| Klumpe Kristoph | 2019 Frankfurt | 02:07:01 | |
| Ogorman Tom | 2023 Stockholm | 02:06:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
