Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Miller John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Miller John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Miller John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Miller John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:35 | 47:24 to 40:49 | 92.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:30 | 05:18 to 04:48 | 7.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:00 to 01:59 | 0.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Miller John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:59 | 00:00 | 04:31 +04:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:59 | 08:59 | 04:24 -00:25 | 04:31 +04:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 12:58 | 04:52 -00:13 | 08:55 +04:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 17:37 | 02:51 -00:27 | 13:47 +03:50 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 20:01 | 05:17 +00:07 | 16:38 +03:23 |
| Sled Pull | 03:54 | 25:25 | 04:48 -00:54 | 21:55 +03:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 29:19 | 05:15 +00:14 | 26:43 +02:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 34:48 | 05:06 +00:12 | 31:58 +02:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 40:06 | 05:25 +00:16 | 37:04 +03:02 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 45:47 | 04:46 -00:16 | 42:29 +03:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 50:17 | 05:17 +00:12 | 47:15 +03:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 55:46 | 02:08 -00:08 | 52:32 +03:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 57:46 | 05:16 +00:05 | 54:40 +03:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:34 | 01:03:07 | 04:57 -00:23 | 59:56 +03:11 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:07:41 | 05:49 +00:37 | 01:04:53 +02:48 |
| Wall Balls | 04:50 | 01:14:07 | 06:17 -01:27 | 01:10:42 +03:25 |
| Roxzone | 04:45 | 01:23:33 | 06:34 -01:49 | 01:23:33 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that John struggled in several running segments, namely Running 1, Running 4, Running 5, and Running 6. These segments accounted for the most time lost during the race. Additionally, he faced challenges in the Burpees Broad Jump and Running 8 segments. However, he performed exceptionally well in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, and Roxzone segments.
To improve his overall performance, John should focus on enhancing his fitness level and reducing his transition time in the Roxzone segment. Improving his overall fitness will enable him to perform better in the running segments, while reducing transition time will help him maintain momentum and avoid unnecessary delays.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, John Miller can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. It is crucial for him to tailor his training to address the specific weaknesses highlighted in the splits analysis, while also maintaining and further developing his strengths in the other segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Soon Edward | 2024 Singapore | 01:23:03 | |
| Salucci Stefano | 2024 Gdansk | 01:23:28 | |
| Gudziunas Jonas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:23:14 | |
| Benz Andreas | 2022 Essen | 01:24:01 | |
| Airò Nicola | 2023 Milan | 01:23:25 | |
| Colley Jesse | 2024 Brisbane | 01:23:17 | |
| Dixon Stephen | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:35 | |
| Mead Tony | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:45 | |
| De Los Santos Randy | 2024 Anaheim | 01:23:11 | |
| Aljobory Wassam | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:23:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:11:30 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
