Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdermott Lauren's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdermott Lauren's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdermott Lauren's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdermott Lauren's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:25 | 46:41 to 44:16 | 48.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:49 | 07:02 to 05:13 | 36.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:41 | 06:15 to 05:34 | 13.6% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:17 to 05:14 | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:31 to 02:29 | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 05:00 to 04:59 | 0.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Mcdermott Lauren | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:03 | 05:05 -00:05 | 05:03 -01:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 09:03 | 05:25 +00:18 | 10:08 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 14:46 | 02:40 -00:09 | 15:33 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 06:18 | 17:17 | 05:42 +00:36 | 18:13 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 07:02 | 23:35 | 05:36 +01:26 | 23:55 -00:20 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 30:37 | 05:44 +00:17 | 29:31 +01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:15 | 36:38 | 05:58 +00:17 | 35:15 +01:23 |
| Running 5 | 06:14 | 42:53 | 05:52 +00:22 | 41:13 +01:40 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 49:07 | 05:20 -00:03 | 47:05 +02:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:52 | 54:24 | 05:46 +00:06 | 52:25 +01:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 01:00:16 | 02:13 -00:18 | 58:11 +02:05 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 01:02:11 | 05:44 +00:23 | 01:00:24 +01:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:42 | 01:08:18 | 04:40 -00:58 | 01:06:08 +02:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:12:00 | 06:05 +00:22 | 01:10:48 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:13 | 01:18:27 | 04:49 -00:36 | 01:16:53 +01:34 |
| Roxzone | 05:45 | 01:28:17 | 06:35 -00:50 | 01:28:17 |
Lauren's total running time of 00:46:41 was 02:45 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may benefit from improving her overall fitness and specifically focusing on her transition time between exercises. Additionally, her best running lap time of 00:04:03 was 00:48 faster than average, indicating that she has the potential to excel in running segments.
In conclusion, Lauren McDermott had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, but there are areas where she can improve to enhance her performance in future races. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, particularly in running segments, and implementing specific training strategies for the identified areas of improvement, Lauren can continue to excel in Hyrox races. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation can further enhance her performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Tusinska Izabela | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:28:10 | |
| Gruss Viktoria | 2023 München | 01:28:40 | |
| Scheffczikova Klara | 2023 Köln | 01:28:44 | |
| Quarz Elena | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:28:10 | |
| Pratt Charlotte | 2023 London | 01:28:38 | |
| Van Der Deen Ilja | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:49 | |
| Clavijo Monica | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:27:56 | |
| Mee Victoria | 2022 Birmingham | 01:28:28 | |
| Huntley Emma | 2022 Manchester | 01:28:25 | |
| Lliger Michelle | 2023 Milan | 01:28:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:24:59 | |
| 2024 London | 01:31:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
