Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Langeweg Wim's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Langeweg Wim hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Langeweg Wim’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Langeweg Wim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:28.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Wim Langeweg's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him within the top 35% overall and top 41% in his age group. This indicates a solid performance, especially in the Wall Balls segment, where he outperformed the average significantly, ranking in the 7th percentile. His total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that his running could be an area to focus on alongside maintaining his strength. The variation in his running splits, with a fast start in Running 1, indicates that he may have started at a pace that was not sustainable throughout the race.
Segments to Improve
Running Performance: While Wim's overall running time was only 1:19 slower than average, the decline in pace after Running 1 indicates a need to improve endurance and pacing strategies.
Training Strategy: Incorporate interval training to improve speed endurance. For example, try 400m repeats at a pace slightly faster than race pace with short recovery periods.
Exercises: Long runs at a comfortable pace to build aerobic capacity, combined with tempo runs to increase lactate threshold.
Burpees Broad Jump: With a time of 5:51, which was 40 seconds slower than average, this is a key area for improvement.
Training Strategy: Focus on explosive power and plyometric exercises, such as box jumps and squat jumps, to enhance the efficiency of the burpee movement.
Form Correction: Ensure proper form during burpees to avoid unnecessary fatigue. Keep the core engaged and minimize time spent in transitions between movements.
Roxzone Transitions: His Roxzone time was slightly slower than average, indicating room for improvement in transition efficiency.
Training Strategy: Practice race simulation workouts that include quick transitions between exercises to reduce downtime.
Exercises: Transition drills focusing on minimizing rest periods, such as moving quickly from a running interval to a strength exercise.
Sandbag Lunges: His time was 9 seconds slower than average, showing potential for enhancement.
Training Strategy: Incorporate unilateral leg strength exercises such as lunges and step-ups to improve stability and strength during lunges.
Exercises: Weighted lunges with sandbags to simulate race conditions and improve endurance in this segment.
Sled Pull: Slightly slower than average, with potential for significant improvement.
Training Strategy: Focus on upper body and core strengthening exercises to enhance pulling power.
Exercises: Sled drags and pulls, along with core exercises like planks, to improve strength and endurance during this segment.
Race Strategies
Pacing Strategy: Start the race at a steady, sustainable pace based on training runs to prevent early fatigue. Monitor pace using a heart rate monitor to ensure energy is conserved for later stages.
Transition Efficiency: Focus on minimizing transition times between exercise zones by practicing quick transitions in training sessions. This could involve rehearsing the sequence of movements to make them second nature.
Nutrition and Hydration: Ensure a well-planned nutrition strategy before and during the race to maintain energy levels. Include quick energy sources like gels or energy drinks during the race.