Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 488 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kuijpers Tessa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kuijpers Tessa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kuijpers Tessa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kuijpers Tessa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:51 | 04:00 to 03:09 | 26.7% |
| Run Total | 00:51 | 38:42 to 37:51 | 26.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 03:56 to 03:28 | 14.7% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:05 to 04:50 | 7.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:49 to 04:37 | 6.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:06 to 01:54 | 6.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 04:17 to 04:05 | 6.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 01:50 to 01:44 | 3.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 04:09 to 04:05 | 2.1% |
| Kuijpers Tessa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:17 | 00:00 | 04:19 -01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 03:17 | 04:45 +00:04 | 04:19 -01:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 08:06 | 04:36 +00:10 | 09:04 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 12:52 | 02:18 -00:12 | 13:40 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 14:58 | 04:49 +00:14 | 15:58 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 20:01 | 04:32 -00:23 | 20:47 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 24:10 | 04:49 +00:20 | 25:19 -01:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 29:19 | 04:23 -00:06 | 30:08 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 33:36 | 04:56 +00:10 | 34:31 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 38:42 | 04:56 +00:09 | 39:27 -00:45 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 43:47 | 04:52 +00:10 | 44:23 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 48:49 | 01:52 -00:02 | 49:15 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 50:39 | 04:51 +00:05 | 51:07 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:56 | 55:35 | 03:41 +00:15 | 55:58 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:26 | 59:31 | 05:04 +00:22 | 59:39 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 04:00 | 01:04:57 | 03:39 +00:21 | 01:04:43 +00:14 |
| Roxzone | 04:30 | 01:13:19 | 04:57 -00:27 | 01:13:19 |
Tessa Kuijpers delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, finishing 41st overall and 7th in her age group, placing her in the top 1% of all competitors. Her overall time of 01:13:19 is commendable, with a total running time of 00:38:42, which is notably faster than the average by 00:06. This demonstrates that Tessa has a strong runner profile. However, the pacing analysis suggests she may have started the race too fast, as her initial running splits were significantly quicker than average, while subsequent running segments showed a gradual slowdown.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rae Catherine | 2023 Hamburg | 01:13:18 | |
| Templin Emilija | 2024 Melbourne | 01:13:14 | |
| Arlt Renata | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:13:10 | |
| Kibble Annie | 2023 Birmingham | 01:13:19 | |
| Moore Helen | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:13:15 | |
| Dekker Marion | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:13:36 | |
| Ciepielak Lena | 2024 Katowice | 01:13:34 | |
| Troup Shannon | 2024 Glasgow | 01:13:45 | |
| Peeler Jennifer | 2024 Melbourne | 01:13:16 | |
| Burns Stephanie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:13:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:17:28 | |
| 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:23:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
