Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 785 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kuijper Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kuijper Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kuijper Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kuijper Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 08:49 to 07:22 | 37.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:26 | 08:13 to 06:47 | 37.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 03:17 to 02:47 | 13.0% |
| Run Total | 00:15 | 51:52 to 51:37 | 6.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:13 | 06:41 to 06:28 | 5.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:50 to 08:50 | 0.0% |
| Kuijper Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 05:24 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 04:08 | 04:47 +00:00 | 05:24 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:58 | 08:55 | 05:59 -00:01 | 10:11 -01:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 14:53 | 03:43 -00:36 | 16:10 -01:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:25 | 18:00 | 06:40 -00:15 | 19:53 -01:53 |
| Sled Pull | 06:41 | 24:25 | 06:32 +00:09 | 26:33 -02:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 31:06 | 06:41 -00:16 | 33:05 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:49 | 37:31 | 07:30 +01:19 | 39:46 -02:15 |
| Running 5 | 07:09 | 46:20 | 07:00 +00:09 | 47:16 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 53:29 | 05:20 -00:01 | 54:16 -00:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:45 | 58:48 | 06:43 +00:02 | 59:36 -00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:17 | 01:05:33 | 02:50 +00:27 | 01:06:19 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:08:50 | 06:48 +00:16 | 01:09:09 -00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:13 | 01:15:54 | 06:57 +01:16 | 01:15:57 -00:03 |
| Running 8 | 08:02 | 01:24:07 | 08:15 -00:13 | 01:22:54 +01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 08:50 | 01:32:09 | 09:05 -00:15 | 01:31:09 +01:00 |
| Roxzone | 09:21 | 01:50:12 | 09:58 -00:37 | 01:50:12 |
Marco Kuijper delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking within the top 64% overall and top 58% in his age group. His total time was 01:50:12, showcasing a strong running ability with a total running time of 00:51:52, which was 02:11 faster than average. This indicates a runner profile, suggesting that his strengths lie more in endurance and speed rather than pure strength. His pacing was strategic, with a notably fast start in Running 1, placing him in the 12th percentile, which might have slightly impacted his later segments. Overall, Marco demonstrated good fitness levels, especially in the running components, while there is room for improvement in strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Abell Jamie | 2024 Milan | 01:50:17 | |
| Jonkman Antony | 2024 Maastricht | 01:49:47 | |
| Sinclair Richard | 2022 London | 01:50:05 | |
| Gadiraju Rohit | 2023 Dallas | 01:50:40 | |
| Ang Jonathan | 2023 Singapore | 01:50:36 | |
| Tiefengraber Martin | 2018 Wien | 01:50:34 | |
| Reyneker Mark | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:49:56 | |
| Lunn Sam | 2023 London | 01:50:40 | |
| Gorrin Jesus | 2022 London | 01:50:00 | |
| Poon Adrian | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:49:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:43:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
