Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Koeleman Jasper's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Koeleman Jasper's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Koeleman Jasper's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Koeleman Jasper's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:58 | 06:12 to 04:14 | 33.7% |
| Run Total | 01:25 | 39:43 to 38:18 | 24.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 06:14 to 05:14 | 17.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:55 | 03:17 to 02:22 | 15.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:01 to 01:49 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:23 to 04:13 | 2.9% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:39 to 04:32 | 2.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 04:17 to 04:14 | 0.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Koeleman Jasper | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:26 | 00:00 | 04:19 +00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:26 | 04:20 +00:03 | 04:19 +00:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 08:49 | 04:38 -00:02 | 08:39 +00:10 |
| Sled Push | 03:17 | 13:25 | 02:40 +00:37 | 13:17 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 04:53 | 16:42 | 05:01 -00:08 | 15:57 +00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 03:50 | 21:35 | 04:27 -00:37 | 20:58 +00:37 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 25:25 | 04:59 +00:01 | 25:25 +00:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:17 | 30:25 | 04:40 -00:23 | 30:24 +00:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 34:42 | 05:09 +00:02 | 35:04 -00:22 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 39:53 | 04:39 +00:00 | 40:13 -00:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 44:32 | 05:02 +00:00 | 44:52 -00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 49:34 | 02:01 +00:00 | 49:54 -00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 51:35 | 05:01 +00:03 | 51:55 -00:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:12 | 56:39 | 04:35 +01:37 | 56:56 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:02:51 | 05:27 +00:07 | 01:01:31 +01:20 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:08:25 | 05:46 +00:28 | 01:06:58 +01:27 |
| Roxzone | 04:07 | 01:18:39 | 05:55 -01:48 | 01:18:39 |
Based on his splits analysis, Jasper's overall running time of 00:39:43 is 01:06 slower than the average, indicating that he can focus on improving his running fitness. However, it is worth noting that his running 3 split was 00:11 faster than the average, suggesting that he has the potential to excel in running.
In conclusion, Jasper Koeleman showed a strong performance in the 2022 Maastricht Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running fitness, specifically in areas such as sandbag lunges, wall balls, and overall running performance, he can further enhance his race performance. Implementing specific training strategies, drills, and exercises tailored to address these areas of improvement will contribute to his overall success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Castilla Montes Antonio | 2024 Bilbao | 01:18:09 | |
| Hein Timo | 2021 Leipzig | 01:18:44 | |
| Mcgrath Mitch | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:11 | |
| Crockett James | 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:46 | |
| Schille Steffen | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:19:09 | |
| Rühle Tim | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:19:00 | |
| Hutley Jack | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:39 | |
| Nixon Nathaniel | 2024 Gdansk | 01:18:14 | |
| Rickli Steven | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:18:52 | |
| Mullin Lee | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Amsterdam | 01:25:48 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
