Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Koek Teus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Koek Teus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Koek Teus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Koek Teus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:20 | 45:49 to 41:29 | 53.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 03:09 | 05:11 to 02:02 | 38.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:19 | 06:20 to 06:01 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:33 to 04:22 | 2.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 04:57 to 04:48 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:30 to 02:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Koek Teus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:02 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:02 | 04:26 +00:07 | 04:36 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 09:35 | 04:56 +00:27 | 09:02 +00:33 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 14:58 | 02:53 -00:23 | 13:58 +01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:39 | 17:28 | 05:22 +00:17 | 16:51 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 23:07 | 04:55 -00:40 | 22:13 +00:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 27:22 | 05:20 +00:04 | 27:08 +00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 32:46 | 05:18 -00:33 | 32:28 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:17 | 37:31 | 05:31 -00:14 | 37:46 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 42:48 | 04:49 -00:10 | 43:17 -00:29 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 47:27 | 05:22 -00:44 | 48:06 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 05:11 | 52:05 | 02:11 +03:00 | 53:28 -01:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 57:16 | 05:21 +00:08 | 55:39 +01:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:57 | 01:02:45 | 05:05 -00:08 | 01:01:00 +01:45 |
| Running 8 | 06:02 | 01:07:42 | 05:58 +00:04 | 01:06:05 +01:37 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:13:44 | 06:29 -00:09 | 01:12:03 +01:41 |
| Roxzone | 05:28 | 01:25:21 | 06:49 -01:21 | 01:25:21 |
Based on the splits analysis, Koek showed consistent performance in most of the segments, with some areas where he gained or lost time compared to the average. Notably, he lost time in the Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, and the Farmers Carry segments.
In terms of pacing, Koek should assess his profile and adjust his training accordingly. If his total running time is faster than average, indicating a more runner profile, he should focus on strength training to improve his overall fitness and transition time. Conversely, if his total running time is slower than average, indicating a need for more running training, he should prioritize running-specific workouts to enhance his running performance.
Overall, by implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques and exercises tailored to address the identified areas of improvement, Teus Koek can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindenhofer Christian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:43 | |
| Canning Ed | 2023 Dublin | 01:25:42 | |
| Łobacz Michał | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:03 | |
| Hondius Randy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:42 | |
| Gomez Javier | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:25:35 | |
| Dominguez Fabian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:15 | |
| De Jong Sietse | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:06 | |
| Dolan Micheal | 2023 Dublin | 01:25:05 | |
| Ali Abdi | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:49 | |
| Losi Lorenzo | 2024 Rimini | 01:25:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:18:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
