Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Johnston Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Johnston Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Johnston Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Johnston Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:15 | 06:14 to 04:59 | 45.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:39 | 03:27 to 02:48 | 23.6% |
| Run Total | 00:28 | 42:57 to 42:29 | 17.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 05:08 to 04:47 | 12.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:08 to 02:06 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:04 to 06:04 | 0.0% |
| Johnston Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:32 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:32 | 04:29 -00:04 | 04:41 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 09:57 | 05:03 -00:19 | 09:10 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 14:41 | 02:59 +00:28 | 14:13 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 18:08 | 05:30 -00:29 | 17:12 +00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 23:09 | 05:04 +00:04 | 22:42 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 28:17 | 05:29 -00:14 | 27:46 +00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:59 | 33:32 | 05:31 -00:32 | 33:15 +00:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 38:31 | 05:40 -00:14 | 38:46 -00:15 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 43:57 | 04:52 -00:10 | 44:26 -00:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 48:39 | 05:31 +00:05 | 49:18 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 54:15 | 02:13 -00:05 | 54:49 -00:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 56:23 | 05:30 -00:04 | 57:02 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:14 | 01:01:49 | 05:16 +00:58 | 01:02:32 -00:43 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:08:03 | 06:08 -00:07 | 01:07:48 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 06:04 | 01:14:04 | 06:44 -00:40 | 01:13:56 +00:08 |
| Roxzone | 07:43 | 01:27:42 | 07:02 +00:41 | 01:27:42 |
Mark Johnston showcased a commendable performance in the HYROX category at the 2024 Birmingham event, finishing in the top 37% of all competitors and in the top 43% of his age group (35-39). His total running time was 00:42:57, which was 00:50 faster than average, reflecting his exceptional running skills. Mark's ability to maintain a consistent pace throughout the race is noteworthy, with his best running lap being 00:04:44. However, he started slower than average on the first running segment, but quickly compensated for this in the subsequent segments, most of which were faster than the average. His overall performance suggests a hybrid profile, displaying impressive strength and running abilities.
For better performance in future races, Mark should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Escalera Joshua | 2024 New York | 01:28:00 | |
| Silulu Vinny | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:36 | |
| Thiel Jannik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:40 | |
| Cole Shane | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:27:26 | |
| Walter Philipp | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:59 | |
| Van Vessem Jeffrey | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:27:31 | |
| Velazquez Carlos | 2021 Madrid | 01:27:33 | |
| Grabowski Tim | 2020 Hannover | 01:27:23 | |
| Rosenthal A | 2023 Dallas | 01:28:04 | |
| Moyne Mathieu | 2024 Paris | 01:27:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:18:34 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:24:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
