Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 473 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hudson Grant's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hudson Grant's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hudson Grant's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hudson Grant's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:09 | 35:25 to 33:16 | 39.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:19 | 06:20 to 05:01 | 23.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:51 | 03:33 to 02:42 | 15.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:47 | 03:57 to 03:10 | 14.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:12 | 04:04 to 03:52 | 3.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:48 to 01:41 | 2.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 04:35 to 04:30 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Hudson Grant | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:35 | 00:00 | 03:46 -01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:45 | 02:35 | 04:02 -00:17 | 03:46 -01:11 |
| Running 2 | 06:32 | 06:20 | 04:03 +02:29 | 07:48 -01:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:33 | 12:52 | 03:08 +00:25 | 11:51 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:20 | 16:25 | 04:22 -00:02 | 14:59 +01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 20:45 | 04:58 -00:23 | 19:21 +01:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:22 | 25:20 | 04:24 -00:02 | 24:19 +01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:57 | 29:42 | 03:33 +00:24 | 28:43 +00:59 |
| Running 5 | 04:35 | 33:39 | 04:27 +00:08 | 32:16 +01:23 |
| Rowing | 04:05 | 38:14 | 04:18 -00:13 | 36:43 +01:31 |
| Running 6 | 04:16 | 42:19 | 04:24 -00:08 | 41:01 +01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 46:35 | 01:55 -00:07 | 45:25 +01:10 |
| Running 7 | 04:08 | 48:23 | 04:27 -00:19 | 47:20 +01:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:04 | 52:31 | 04:12 -00:08 | 51:47 +00:44 |
| Running 8 | 04:41 | 56:35 | 04:45 -00:04 | 55:59 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:01:16 | 05:40 +00:40 | 01:00:44 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 03:41 | 01:11:09 | 04:45 -01:04 | 01:11:09 |
Grant Hudson delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, securing an overall rank of 64, placing him in the top 15% of all athletes. Within his age group of 30-34, he ranked 23rd, putting him in the top 19%. His overall time of 01:11:09 reflects strong athletic potential.
Grant's total running time was 00:35:25, which is 00:31 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement in his running efficiency. Notably, he had an impressive start with Running 1, clocking in 01:10 faster than average, suggesting that he might have started too fast, leading to a slightly slower subsequent performance. Grant's performance indicates a hybrid athlete profile with strengths in both running and strength exercises, although his running needs a bit more focus to balance his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hay Cory | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:11:35 | |
| Gough Mark | 2024 Paris | 01:11:24 | |
| Wilkins Harrison | 2023 London | 01:11:29 | |
| Chatham Inness | 2024 Melbourne | 01:11:03 | |
| Muscart James | 2023 Manchester | 01:11:19 | |
| Eyre Alexander | 2024 Birmingham | 01:11:02 | |
| Binder Jochen | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:11:18 | |
| Rodrigo Morata Juanjo | 2023 Madrid | 01:11:10 | |
| Müller Philipp | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:10:45 | |
| Steincke Robin | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:11:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:08:50 | |
| 2023 Dubai | 01:25:15 | |
| 2024 London | 01:09:51 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:06:08 | |
| 2024 Gdansk | 01:13:21 | |
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:22:42 | |
| 2022 London | 01:28:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
