Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 99 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Heikens Lisa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Heikens Lisa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Heikens Lisa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Heikens Lisa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:00 | 50:48 to 46:48 | 88.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 03:31 to 03:10 | 7.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 | 07:49 to 07:40 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:25 to 06:25 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Heikens Lisa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:11 | 00:00 | 05:12 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:11 | 05:01 -00:28 | 05:12 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 08:44 | 05:27 +00:41 | 10:13 -01:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:40 | 14:52 | 04:31 -00:51 | 15:40 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 18:32 | 05:51 +00:13 | 20:11 -01:39 |
| Sled Pull | 06:25 | 24:36 | 07:52 -01:27 | 26:02 -01:26 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 31:01 | 05:53 +00:22 | 33:54 -02:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:01 | 37:16 | 06:23 -00:22 | 39:47 -02:31 |
| Running 5 | 06:47 | 43:17 | 06:03 +00:44 | 46:10 -02:53 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 50:04 | 05:24 -00:19 | 52:13 -02:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:37 | 55:09 | 05:54 +00:43 | 57:37 -02:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:31 | 01:01:46 | 03:05 +00:26 | 01:03:31 -01:45 |
| Running 7 | 06:58 | 01:05:17 | 05:58 +01:00 | 01:06:36 -01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 01:12:15 | 06:13 -00:55 | 01:12:34 -00:19 |
| Running 8 | 07:51 | 01:17:33 | 06:34 +01:17 | 01:18:47 -01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 07:49 | 01:25:24 | 07:57 -00:08 | 01:25:21 +00:03 |
| Roxzone | 07:55 | 01:41:02 | 07:44 +00:11 | 01:41:02 |
Lisa Heikens delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 33% overall and the top 30% in her age group. Her strength in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull segments was evident, showcasing a robust strength profile. However, her total running time was slower than average by 03:42, indicating that running is an area for improvement. The analysis of the initial running segments suggests that Lisa started the race on a strong note, with Running 1 significantly faster than average. However, the subsequent running segments showed a decline in pacing, suggesting a need for endurance training to maintain speed throughout the race. Lisa's performance can be categorized as having a strong strength profile with room for improvement in running stamina and efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bertolini Alice | 2024 Turin | 01:41:26 | |
| Girdea Olga | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:41:20 | |
| 李 | 2024 Beijing | 01:41:27 | |
| Pelier Marielle | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:41:17 | |
| Ravid Nitzan | 2024 Dallas | 01:40:38 | |
| Mccreanor Monique | 2023 Sydney | 01:40:58 | |
| Evans Bethan | 2023 London | 01:41:27 | |
| Esser Kaye | 2024 Turin | 01:40:52 | |
| Pietryga Jessica | 2024 Sydney | 01:40:39 | |
| Fuchs Lina | 2020 Hannover | 01:41:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:35:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
