Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 413 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Heard Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Heard Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Heard Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Heard Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 00:58 | 04:03 to 03:05 | 28.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:39 | 04:03 to 03:24 | 18.9% |
| Run Total | 00:38 | 38:00 to 37:22 | 18.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 02:23 to 01:52 | 15.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 | 04:57 to 04:35 | 10.7% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 05:04 to 04:48 | 7.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:03 to 04:01 | 1.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:50 to 03:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Heard Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:38 | 00:00 | 04:14 -00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:57 | 03:38 | 04:43 +00:14 | 04:14 -00:36 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 08:35 | 04:32 +00:19 | 08:57 -00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 13:26 | 02:14 +00:09 | 13:29 -00:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 15:49 | 04:45 +00:03 | 15:43 +00:06 |
| Sled Pull | 04:03 | 20:37 | 04:27 -00:24 | 20:28 +00:09 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 24:40 | 04:46 -00:02 | 24:55 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:50 | 29:24 | 04:21 -00:31 | 29:41 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 04:50 | 33:14 | 04:52 -00:02 | 34:02 -00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 38:04 | 04:56 +00:08 | 38:54 -00:50 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 43:08 | 04:48 +00:02 | 43:50 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:42 | 47:58 | 01:52 -00:10 | 48:38 -00:40 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 49:40 | 04:47 +00:09 | 50:30 -00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:03 | 54:36 | 03:36 +00:27 | 55:17 -00:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:27 | 58:39 | 05:01 +00:26 | 58:53 -00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 04:03 | 01:04:06 | 03:36 +00:27 | 01:03:54 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 04:19 | 01:12:20 | 04:50 -00:31 | 01:12:20 |
Emily Heard delivered an exceptional performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 35 out of 3118 athletes, which places her in the top 1% of all participants and first in her age group (50-54), outperforming 116 athletes. Her overall time of 01:12:20 is commendable, with a total running time of 00:38:00, which is 00:06 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile, suggesting that she excels more in running compared to strength-based exercises. Emily's initial running segments showed she started slightly faster than average, indicating a well-paced beginning.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Armenti Alexa | 2023 Chicago | 01:12:08 | |
| Anderson Maddy | 2024 Brisbane | 01:12:10 | |
| Saunes Kristin | 2024 Milan | 01:12:34 | |
| Swider Renee | 2023 Chicago | 01:12:36 | |
| Dedman Charlotte | 2023 Manchester | 01:12:16 | |
| Wolff Angelika | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:12:25 | |
| Jones Josephine | 2023 Barcelona | 01:12:37 | |
| De Bruijne Romy | 2024 Paris | 01:12:36 | |
| Hertle Ludmilla | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:12:04 | |
| Gammon Jacquelyn | 2024 Dallas | 01:12:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:20:11 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:16:35 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:15:44 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:21:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
