Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Griffith Shane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Griffith Shane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Griffith Shane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Griffith Shane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:05 | 41:36 to 38:31 | 69.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:56 | 05:02 to 04:06 | 21.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:39 to 02:23 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:22 to 04:14 | 3.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Griffith Shane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:10 | 00:00 | 04:19 +01:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 06:10 | 04:20 +00:02 | 04:19 +01:51 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 10:32 | 04:39 +00:15 | 08:39 +01:53 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 15:26 | 02:41 -00:02 | 13:18 +02:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 18:05 | 05:02 +00:09 | 15:59 +02:06 |
| Sled Pull | 05:02 | 23:16 | 04:28 +00:34 | 21:01 +02:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 28:18 | 05:01 +00:17 | 25:29 +02:49 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:19 | 33:36 | 04:43 -01:24 | 30:30 +03:06 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 36:55 | 05:10 +00:13 | 35:13 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 42:18 | 04:40 -00:11 | 40:23 +01:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 46:47 | 05:03 +00:04 | 45:03 +01:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 51:54 | 02:01 -00:16 | 50:06 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 53:39 | 05:02 +00:12 | 52:07 +01:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 58:53 | 04:36 -00:22 | 57:09 +01:44 |
| Running 8 | 04:22 | 01:03:07 | 05:30 -01:08 | 01:01:45 +01:22 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:07:29 | 05:47 -00:45 | 01:07:15 +00:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:39 | 01:19:03 | 06:01 +00:38 | 01:19:03 |
Shane Griffith delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 302, which places him in the top 22% of all participants. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 92nd, placing him in the top 26% among his peers. Shane's overall time was 01:19:03, with a total running time of 00:41:36, which was 01:25 slower than the average. His performance in the strength-based exercises generally surpassed his running, suggesting a stronger profile in strength-oriented activities. Notably, Shane's initial running segments were slower, indicating a conservative start, but he improved significantly in later segments, especially in Running 8, where he outperformed the average by 01:13. This indicates a potential for better pacing strategy and a hybrid athlete profile with opportunities to enhance running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fourie Wynand | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:32 | |
| Vaid Mayank | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:18:36 | |
| Sthlfors Mikael | 2023 Stockholm | 01:19:33 | |
| Morgan Mitch | 2024 London | 01:18:49 | |
| Graham Antony | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:19:17 | |
| Roberts Aidan | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:17 | |
| Lee Gabriel | 2023 Singapore | 01:18:51 | |
| Doodson Nic | 2022 London | 01:18:44 | |
| Fontenot Ryham | 2023 London | 01:19:02 | |
| Smith Jeremy | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:20:03 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
