Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Giles Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Giles Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Giles Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Giles Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:37 | 42:03 to 39:26 | 44.5% |
| Sled Pull | 01:02 | 05:17 to 04:15 | 17.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:50 | 02:44 to 01:54 | 14.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:38 | 04:54 to 04:16 | 10.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:32 | 04:58 to 04:26 | 9.1% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:50 to 04:36 | 4.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:33 to 03:33 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Giles Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 04:08 | 04:22 +00:32 | 04:23 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 09:02 | 04:45 +00:03 | 08:45 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 13:50 | 02:44 -00:38 | 13:30 +00:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 15:56 | 05:08 -00:08 | 16:14 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:17 | 20:56 | 04:36 +00:41 | 21:22 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 26:13 | 05:06 +00:06 | 25:58 +00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:33 | 31:25 | 04:56 -01:23 | 31:04 +00:21 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 34:58 | 05:16 +00:30 | 36:00 -01:02 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 40:44 | 04:42 +00:08 | 41:16 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 45:34 | 05:09 +00:25 | 45:58 -00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:44 | 51:08 | 02:04 +00:40 | 51:07 +00:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 53:52 | 05:07 +00:18 | 53:11 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:58 | 59:17 | 04:46 +00:12 | 58:18 +00:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:15 | 01:04:15 | 05:36 +00:39 | 01:03:04 +01:11 |
| Wall Balls | 04:55 | 01:10:30 | 06:00 -01:05 | 01:08:40 +01:50 |
| Roxzone | 05:36 | 01:20:51 | 06:11 -00:35 | 01:20:51 |
Stephen Giles demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Sydney HYROX race, finishing with an overall rank of 310 out of 1059 athletes, placing him in the top 29%. Within his age group (35-39), he ranked 50th, which is in the top 27%. His total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting a balanced but slightly runner-leaning profile. The initial running segments indicate that Stephen started at a competitive pace, but his overall running slowed down as the race progressed. This pattern suggests possible fatigue or insufficient pacing in the middle-to-late stages of the race. The Roxzone time was notably faster than average, indicating efficient transitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitts William | 2023 Anaheim | 01:20:59 | |
| Tomlins Iain | 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:55 | |
| Zukauskas Nerijus | 2023 Birmingham | 01:20:30 | |
| Camozzi Corrado | 2024 Milan | 01:21:05 | |
| Schilling Benjamin | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:20:44 | |
| Woolery Antony | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:23 | |
| Tazi Abdel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:10 | |
| Alting Van Geusau Xavier | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:20:57 | |
| Burns Regan | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:21:16 | |
| Belden Mark | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:20:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
