Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of Frenk Milan's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Frenk Milan hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Frenk Milan’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Frenk Milan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
10:04.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Milan Frenk finished in the top 45% overall and the top 50% in his age group, demonstrating a commendable performance in a competitive field. His overall time of 01:31:38 indicates a strong level of fitness, with particular strengths in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, where he ranked exceptionally high. However, Milan's total running time was 08:39 slower than the average, suggesting that running is an area requiring improvement. His performance in the first few running segments indicates he may have started too slow, particularly in Running 2, which was significantly slower than the average. Overall, Milan has a strong strength profile but needs to enhance his running efficiency to become a more balanced hybrid athlete.
Segments to Improve
Running Segments:
Running was consistently slower than average, particularly in Running 2 and Running 8. To improve running efficiency, Milan should focus on building both aerobic capacity and running endurance. Specific training strategies include:
Interval Training: Incorporate intervals of high-intensity running followed by recovery periods to increase speed and endurance. Example: 5 x 800m at race pace with 3-minute recovery.
Tempo Runs: Perform runs at a steady, challenging pace to build lactate threshold and improve running economy. Example: 20-minute tempo run at a pace slightly slower than 5K race pace.
Form Drills: Focus on running form to improve efficiency. Include drills like high knees, butt kicks, and strides.
Roxzone:
Although Milan's Roxzone time was faster than average, further improvements could enhance his overall time. Improving transitions and minimizing rest time between exercises will benefit performance. Suggested techniques include:
Transition Practice: Simulate race conditions in training by practicing quick transitions between different exercises.
Strength and Mobility: Enhance overall fitness with exercises that improve core strength and flexibility, aiding in quicker transitions.
Race Strategies
Pacing Strategy: Avoid starting too slow by setting a consistent pace from the beginning. Use a pacing strategy based on training runs to ensure energy is conserved for later stages.
Compromised Running Scenarios: Practice running immediately after high-intensity exercises like the Sled Push or Wall Balls to simulate and adapt to fatigue during transitions.
Focus on Strength Segments: Leverage strengths in exercises like Sled Push and Wall Balls to gain time, allowing for a more relaxed approach to weaker running segments.