Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feld Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feld Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feld Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feld Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:03 | 05:36 to 04:33 | 43.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:43 | 02:40 to 01:57 | 29.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 05:14 to 04:39 | 24.0% |
| Run Total | 00:05 | 40:13 to 40:08 | 3.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:06 to 02:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Feld Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 04:49 | 04:23 -00:16 | 04:29 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:51 | 08:56 | 04:49 +00:02 | 08:52 +00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 13:47 | 02:47 -00:41 | 13:41 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 04:58 | 15:53 | 05:13 -00:15 | 16:28 -00:35 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 20:51 | 04:41 -00:53 | 21:41 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:54 | 24:39 | 05:11 -00:17 | 26:22 -01:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 29:33 | 04:59 +00:15 | 31:33 -02:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 34:47 | 05:21 -00:09 | 36:32 -01:45 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 39:59 | 04:44 -00:09 | 41:53 -01:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 44:34 | 05:14 -00:11 | 46:37 -02:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:40 | 49:37 | 02:07 +00:33 | 51:51 -02:14 |
| Running 7 | 04:51 | 52:17 | 05:12 -00:21 | 53:58 -01:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 57:08 | 04:51 +00:45 | 59:10 -02:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:02:44 | 05:42 -00:04 | 01:04:01 -01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 04:54 | 01:08:22 | 06:10 -01:16 | 01:09:43 -01:21 |
| Roxzone | 09:07 | 01:22:15 | 06:22 +02:45 | 01:22:15 |
Matt Feld delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 434th out of 1801 athletes, placing him in the top 24%. His age group ranking was 103rd out of 378 athletes, placing him in the top 27%. His total time of 01:22:15, complemented by a total running time of 00:40:13, was 1 minute and 17 seconds faster than the average, suggesting a strong running capability. His best running lap of 00:04:51 further underscores his proficiency. However, Matt exhibited a tendency to start slightly slower than average in the early running segments, which may have been a strategic move to conserve energy for later stages. Overall, Matt demonstrates a balanced profile with a slight edge in running, indicating that he is a hybrid athlete with strong running capabilities and efficient strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Suggitt Paul | 2023 London | 01:22:42 | |
| Sargant Craig | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:23 | |
| Costa Fernando | 2024 Madrid | 01:21:53 | |
| Mills Steven | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:11 | |
| Alblooshi Mohammed | 2023 Dubai | 01:22:11 | |
| Prums Manfred | 2024 Hamburg | 01:22:44 | |
| Cardenas Moreno Julio Cesar | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:22:08 | |
| Rea Pascal | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:22:33 | |
| Fersch Jeffrey | 2023 Chicago | 01:22:02 | |
| Dell'Occhio Fabrizio | 2024 Milan | 01:22:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
