Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 444 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dean Rachel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dean Rachel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dean Rachel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dean Rachel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:42 | 15:17 to 08:35 | 76.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:24 | 08:29 to 07:05 | 16.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 06:45 to 06:22 | 4.4% |
| Run Total | 00:17 | 55:41 to 55:24 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Dean Rachel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 06:00 -01:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 04:35 | 05:30 -00:27 | 06:00 -01:25 |
| Running 2 | 06:36 | 09:38 | 06:37 -00:01 | 11:30 -01:52 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 16:14 | 03:27 -01:12 | 18:07 -01:53 |
| Running 3 | 06:39 | 18:29 | 07:05 -00:26 | 21:34 -03:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:39 | 25:08 | 07:34 -01:55 | 28:39 -03:31 |
| Running 4 | 06:54 | 30:47 | 07:08 -00:14 | 36:13 -05:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 15:17 | 37:41 | 08:49 +06:28 | 43:21 -05:40 |
| Running 5 | 07:17 | 52:58 | 07:25 -00:08 | 52:10 +00:48 |
| Rowing | 05:25 | 01:00:15 | 05:55 -00:30 | 59:35 +00:40 |
| Running 6 | 07:25 | 01:05:40 | 07:19 +00:06 | 01:05:30 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:39 | 01:13:05 | 02:47 -00:08 | 01:12:49 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 07:11 | 01:15:44 | 07:17 -00:06 | 01:15:36 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:45 | 01:22:55 | 06:33 +00:12 | 01:22:53 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 09:07 | 01:29:40 | 08:19 +00:48 | 01:29:26 +00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 08:29 | 01:38:47 | 07:05 +01:24 | 01:37:45 +01:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:54:18 | 09:28 -02:19 | 01:54:18 |
Rachel Dean delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, securing an overall rank of 943 out of 3118 athletes. Her performance places her in the top 30% of her age group (45-49), showcasing her competitive edge. Notably, Rachel's total running time was 02:29 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, her pacing strategy might need slight adjustments; she started the race on a fast note, especially in the initial running segments, and this may have impacted her energy levels in later stages.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lindberg Ditte | 2023 Malmö | 01:54:08 | |
| Fisher Rachael | 2021 London | 01:54:14 | |
| Treiber Elisabeth | 2018 Wien | 01:54:12 | |
| Acuña Rangel Regina Monserrat | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:53:48 | |
| Low Chai Ling | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:53:58 | |
| López Cesario Rahel Joyce | 2024 Madrid | 01:54:19 | |
| Shea Stephanie | 2024 Manchester | 01:54:33 | |
| Lewis Chloe | 2024 Glasgow | 01:54:30 | |
| Cartwright Hollie | 2024 Manchester | 01:54:41 | |
| Jüstel Irmela | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:54:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:52:05 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
