Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire De Vries Mc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Vries Mc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Vries Mc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Vries Mc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
07:39.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Mc De Vries delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 1758 out of 3118 participants, placing him within the top 56%. In his age group (30-34), he ranked 418, situating him in the top 62%. His overall time was 01:38:51, with a total running time of 00:52:43, which was 04:02 slower than the average. This indicates a need for improvement in running efficiency. Mc De Vries exhibits a strong hybrid profile, with notable strengths in both strength-based exercises and certain running segments. However, his pacing strategy appears to be inconsistent; he started strong in the initial running segments but gradually slowed down, suggesting a potential pacing issue.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time: Mc De Vries's total running time was slower than average. To enhance his running performance, he should focus on the following:
Training Strategies: Incorporate interval training to improve speed and endurance. Example: 400m repeats at a pace faster than race pace, with 1-minute rest intervals.
Drills: High-knee drills and sprints to enhance leg turnover and running form.
Exercises: Strengthen lower body muscles through squats, lunges, and plyometrics.
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was 01:50 slower than average.
Training Strategies: Work on explosive power and endurance. Perform sets of burpees with a focus on smooth transitions and efficient jumping technique.
Drills: Include box jumps and broad jumps in training to enhance explosive leg power.
Sled Push: Slightly slower than average, highlighting a need for strength improvement.
Training Strategies: Incorporate sled workouts with varying weights to build strength and power.
Exercises: Focus on leg and core strength with exercises like deadlifts and weighted lunges.
Sandbag Lunges: While faster than average, there's room for improvement.
Training Strategies: Practice lunges with sandbags of different weights to build endurance and improve balance.
Exercises: Incorporate Bulgarian split squats and kettlebell lunges to enhance leg strength and stability.
Race Strategies
Pacing Strategy: To address the pacing inconsistency, Mc De Vries should aim for a more controlled start, maintaining a steady pace throughout the race. Practice tempo runs to help gauge and maintain race pace over longer distances.
Transition Efficiency: Although his roxzone time was faster than average, continuous improvement in transition efficiency can further enhance overall performance. Practice quick transitions during training to minimize downtime between segments.
Compromised Running: Post-strength exercise running segments were slower. Integrate compromised running drills, such as running immediately after a set of burpees or lunges, to simulate race conditions and improve adaptation.