Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 259 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Coyne Emma's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Coyne Emma hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Coyne Emma’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Coyne Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:27 | 06:37 to 05:10 | 34.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:16 | 05:25 to 04:09 | 30.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 03:38 to 03:12 | 10.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:32 to 02:10 | 8.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:40 to 04:20 | 8.0% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 05:00 to 04:48 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:42 to 04:35 | 2.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:04 to 37:04 | 0.0% |
| Coyne Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:07 | 00:00 | 04:15 -01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:07 | 04:40 +00:02 | 04:15 -01:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 07:49 | 04:35 -00:07 | 08:55 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 12:17 | 03:35 +00:03 | 13:30 -01:13 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 15:55 | 04:57 -00:11 | 17:05 -01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 20:41 | 05:46 -00:50 | 22:02 -01:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:43 | 25:37 | 04:53 -00:10 | 27:48 -02:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 30:20 | 04:22 +01:03 | 32:41 -02:21 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 35:45 | 04:57 +00:03 | 37:03 -01:18 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 40:45 | 04:54 +00:06 | 42:00 -01:15 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 45:45 | 04:54 +00:05 | 46:54 -01:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 50:44 | 02:21 +00:11 | 51:48 -01:04 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 53:16 | 04:57 -00:02 | 54:09 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:40 | 58:11 | 04:32 +00:08 | 59:06 -00:55 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:02:51 | 05:16 -00:05 | 01:03:38 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 06:37 | 01:08:02 | 05:33 +01:04 | 01:08:54 -00:52 |
| Roxzone | 05:14 | 01:19:44 | 05:17 -00:03 | 01:19:44 |
Emma Coyne delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 73, placing her in the top 18% of all athletes. Her total running time was 1:53 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. This suggests a runner profile, where she excels in running segments but might need to balance with strength training. Emma started the race with a particularly fast pace, as seen in Running 1, indicating a potential need for pacing adjustments to maintain stamina. Her overall strategy should focus on maintaining her running strength while enhancing performance in strength-intensive exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Simeoli Serena | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:20:08 | |
| Alziary Yolaine | 2024 Paris | 01:19:50 | |
| Brobeck Rosberg Mia | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:58 | |
| Plambeck Birgit | 2022 Essen | 01:19:45 | |
| Wade Rebecca | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:19:52 | |
| Schlaefcke Lea | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:22 | |
| Bergenwall Jenni | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:20:03 | |
| Gomes Catarina | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:19:59 | |
| Weightman Brittany | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:20:14 | |
| Apel Rebecca | 2024 Sydney | 01:19:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Malaga | 01:15:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
