Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Connolly Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Connolly Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Connolly Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Connolly Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:15 | 47:26 to 43:11 | 82.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 05:55 to 05:22 | 10.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 05:10 to 04:54 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:33 to 04:27 | 1.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Connolly Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:30 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 04:15 | 04:30 +00:03 | 04:45 -00:30 |
| Running 2 | 05:43 | 08:48 | 05:06 +00:37 | 09:15 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 14:31 | 03:01 -00:38 | 14:21 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 16:54 | 05:34 +00:20 | 17:22 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:10 | 22:48 | 05:09 +00:01 | 22:56 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 27:58 | 05:34 +00:21 | 28:05 -00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:55 | 33:53 | 05:41 +00:14 | 33:39 +00:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 39:48 | 05:44 +00:07 | 39:20 +00:28 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 45:39 | 04:53 -00:25 | 45:04 +00:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:27 | 50:07 | 05:35 +00:52 | 49:57 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 56:34 | 02:16 -00:17 | 55:32 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 58:33 | 05:34 +00:41 | 57:48 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:43 | 01:04:48 | 05:24 -00:41 | 01:03:22 +01:26 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:09:31 | 06:15 +00:53 | 01:08:46 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 04:44 | 01:16:39 | 06:52 -02:08 | 01:15:01 +01:38 |
| Roxzone | 07:52 | 01:29:09 | 07:16 +00:36 | 01:29:09 |
Kevin Connolly finished the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox race with an overall time of 01:29:09, placing him in the top 31% of athletes. Within his age group, he ranked 56th out of 173 participants, indicating a commendable performance. However, his total running time was 2:53 slower than the average, suggesting that running is an area that needs improvement. The data shows that Kevin has a strong profile in strength-related exercises, as evidenced by his top percentile ranks in segments like the sled push, rowing, and wall balls. His fastest running lap (00:05:43) was recorded early in the race, indicating that he might have started too fast, which could have contributed to slower times in the latter running segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lorentz Joakim | 2024 Stockholm | 01:29:12 | |
| Bourderiou Will | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:29:39 | |
| Mcneill Craig | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:30 | |
| Müller Manuel | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:28:40 | |
| Lysgaard Thomas | 2024 Malaga | 01:28:43 | |
| Kenny Alex | 2023 Paris | 01:29:15 | |
| Hengstler Frank | 2024 Hamburg | 01:28:42 | |
| Butcher Christopher | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:56 | |
| Kane Chris | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:44 | |
| Lanser Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:29:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
