Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cahill Stephen's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cahill Stephen's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cahill Stephen's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cahill Stephen's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:48 | 46:17 to 42:29 | 84.4% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:06 to 04:47 | 7.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 05:29 to 05:12 | 6.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 04:53 to 04:47 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:50 to 05:50 | 0.0% |
| Cahill Stephen | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:23 | 00:00 | 04:41 -01:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:23 | 04:29 -00:18 | 04:41 -01:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:55 | 07:34 | 05:03 +00:52 | 09:10 -01:36 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 13:29 | 02:58 -00:37 | 14:13 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 06:02 | 15:50 | 05:30 +00:32 | 17:11 -01:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:53 | 21:52 | 05:03 -00:10 | 22:41 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 26:45 | 05:29 +00:29 | 27:44 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:29 | 32:43 | 05:31 -00:02 | 33:13 -00:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:59 | 38:12 | 05:40 +01:19 | 38:44 -00:32 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 45:11 | 04:52 +00:14 | 44:24 +00:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 50:17 | 05:31 +00:47 | 49:16 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 56:35 | 02:13 -00:18 | 54:47 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:45 | 58:30 | 05:30 +01:15 | 57:00 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:05:15 | 05:15 -00:44 | 01:02:30 +02:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:00 | 01:09:46 | 06:09 -01:09 | 01:07:45 +02:01 |
| Wall Balls | 05:50 | 01:14:46 | 06:44 -00:54 | 01:13:54 +00:52 |
| Roxzone | 07:12 | 01:27:40 | 07:02 +00:10 | 01:27:40 |
Stephen Cahill's performance in the 2024 Dublin HYROX event demonstrated strong competencies in certain areas, while highlighting potential opportunities for improvement in others. Stephen placed in the top 39% of all athletes and in the top 46% of his age group, a commendable achievement given the competitiveness of the event.
One key observation from his performance is that he started the race off strong, performing significantly better than the average in the initial Running 1 and Ski Erg segments. However, as the race progressed, his performance in the running segments tended to slow down compared to the average. This might indicate that Stephen started the race at a higher pace than he could maintain throughout the event. Additionally, looking at the total running time, Stephen seems to have a more strength-based profile, as his total running time was slower than average.
Considering his performance, here are some strategies Stephen might find useful for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rinehart Seneca | 2021 Austin | 01:27:27 | |
| Van Taylor Liam | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:36 | |
| Wilkes Jonathan | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:10 | |
| Süßmilch Jan | 2020 Hannover | 01:28:09 | |
| Mcreynolds Matthew | 2023 Dallas | 01:27:18 | |
| Grawe Max | 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:29 | |
| Bland Mark | 2024 Melbourne | 01:27:20 | |
| Shpakoff Brian | 2023 Dallas | 01:27:59 | |
| Wahedi Elyas | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:27:15 | |
| Mcguigan Stephen | 2024 Rimini | 01:27:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
