Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burgess Emily's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burgess Emily's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burgess Emily's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burgess Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:11 | 07:19 to 05:08 | 67.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:58 | 07:28 to 06:30 | 29.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:17 to 05:11 | 3.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:32 to 02:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:23 to 05:23 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 47:02 to 47:02 | 0.0% |
| Burgess Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:48 | 00:00 | 05:22 +01:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 06:48 | 05:14 +00:03 | 05:22 +01:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:46 | 12:05 | 05:45 +00:01 | 10:36 +01:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 17:51 | 02:54 -00:22 | 16:21 +01:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 20:23 | 06:04 -00:24 | 19:15 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 26:03 | 06:12 -00:23 | 25:19 +00:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 31:52 | 06:04 -00:23 | 31:31 +00:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:28 | 37:33 | 06:47 +00:41 | 37:35 -00:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:39 | 45:01 | 06:14 -00:35 | 44:22 +00:39 |
| Rowing | 05:23 | 50:40 | 05:31 -00:08 | 50:36 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 56:03 | 06:08 -00:22 | 56:07 -00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 01:01:49 | 02:24 -00:23 | 01:02:15 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 01:03:50 | 06:07 -00:32 | 01:04:39 -00:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:09:25 | 05:13 -00:19 | 01:10:46 -01:21 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:14:19 | 06:40 -00:31 | 01:15:59 -01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 07:19 | 01:20:28 | 05:32 +01:47 | 01:22:39 -02:11 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:35:50 | 07:39 +00:31 | 01:35:50 |
Emily Burgess has shown a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Her overall rank is 752, placing her in the top 18% of 4107 athletes. Moreover, her rank in the age group 45-49 is 63, securing a position in the top 16% of 386 athletes. Emily's total running time was 47:02, which is 1:56 faster than the average, highlighting her exceptional running capabilities. With her best running lap at 5:35, it becomes clear that Emily's strength lies in her running. However, she started the race slightly slower than average, indicating a need to focus on pacing for future events.
While Emily showed a strong running performance, certain segments require attention for improvement:
Emily should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hewitt Amanda | 2024 Milan | 01:35:58 | |
| Mcgowan Laura | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:26 | |
| Harig Dorit | 2022 Hamburg | 01:36:04 | |
| kozerski melissa | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:36:11 | |
| Gannaway Jeannette | 2024 Houston | 01:36:12 | |
| Phillpott Chloe | 2021 London | 01:35:25 | |
| Esterlich Jessica | 2023 München | 01:36:12 | |
| Reid Sarah | 2022 Birmingham | 01:35:24 | |
| Thominsky Melissa | 2022 Hamburg | 01:36:10 | |
| Smith Kate | 2023 London | 01:36:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:47:38 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
