Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 741 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bergsma Marlies's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bergsma Marlies's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bergsma Marlies's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bergsma Marlies's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:12 | 42:25 to 38:13 | 73.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:57 | 04:09 to 03:12 | 16.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 04:27 to 04:10 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:53 to 04:38 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:52 to 04:51 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:56 to 01:56 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Bergsma Marlies | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:31 | 00:00 | 04:27 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 03:31 | 04:49 +00:04 | 04:27 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 08:24 | 04:46 +00:17 | 09:16 -00:52 |
| Sled Push | 01:56 | 13:27 | 02:23 -00:27 | 14:02 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 15:23 | 05:00 +00:19 | 16:25 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 03:51 | 20:42 | 04:42 -00:51 | 21:25 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 05:37 | 24:33 | 05:00 +00:37 | 26:07 -01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:27 | 30:10 | 04:45 -00:18 | 31:07 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 34:37 | 05:06 +00:35 | 35:52 -01:15 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 40:18 | 05:03 -00:11 | 40:58 -00:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 45:10 | 05:02 +00:27 | 46:01 -00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 50:39 | 01:58 -00:22 | 51:03 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:39 | 52:15 | 05:01 +00:38 | 53:01 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:31 | 57:54 | 03:51 -00:20 | 58:02 -00:08 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:01:25 | 05:19 +00:51 | 01:01:53 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 04:09 | 01:07:35 | 03:53 +00:16 | 01:07:12 +00:23 |
| Roxzone | 04:53 | 01:16:29 | 05:24 -00:31 | 01:16:29 |
Marlies Bergsma delivered an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 78 and placing 12th in her age group. This puts her in the top 2% of all participants and top 1% within her age group, indicating a strong competitive edge. Her total running time was 2:10 slower than average, suggesting that she could benefit from enhanced running training. The initial running segments indicate that Marlies may have started too fast, especially given her 9th percentile rank in Running 1, but slowed considerably in the latter segments. This suggests a need for better pacing strategies. Overall, Marlies exhibits a more hybrid profile, excelling in strength segments like Sled Push and Pull but needing improvement in overall running and endurance.
By focusing on these targeted strategies and training techniques, Marlies Bergsma can continue to excel and potentially improve her future performances in Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Helyar Rachel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:21 | |
| Codina Villaró Jèssica | 2024 Madrid | 01:16:21 | |
| Ortiz Carla | 2023 Madrid | 01:16:42 | |
| Walters Zara | 2024 Rimini | 01:16:22 | |
| Fox Pamela | 2022 Chicago | 01:16:43 | |
| Hanine Dounia | 2024 Marseille | 01:16:51 | |
| Powers Katherine | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:16:46 | |
| Engelbrecht Charleen | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:16:38 | |
| Hall Kerry | 2024 Birmingham | 01:16:27 | |
| Zimmermann Lara | 2024 Berlin | 01:16:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
