Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Andrews Molly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Andrews Molly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Andrews Molly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Andrews Molly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:46 | 07:59 to 05:13 | 41.9% |
| Wall Balls | 02:39 | 06:39 to 04:00 | 40.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 04:37 to 04:13 | 6.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:15 | 05:11 to 04:56 | 3.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 02:35 to 02:21 | 3.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:09 to 02:00 | 2.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 05:00 to 04:54 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:11 to 05:08 | 0.8% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:10 to 39:10 | 0.0% |
| Andrews Molly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:47 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 04:47 | 05:01 -00:01 | 04:58 -00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 09:47 | 05:16 -00:38 | 09:59 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 14:25 | 02:36 -00:01 | 15:15 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 17:00 | 05:30 -00:41 | 17:51 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 21:49 | 05:24 -00:13 | 23:21 -01:32 |
| Running 4 | 04:49 | 27:00 | 05:33 -00:44 | 28:45 -01:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:59 | 31:49 | 05:37 +02:22 | 34:18 -02:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:12 | 39:48 | 05:41 -00:29 | 39:55 -00:07 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 45:00 | 05:16 -00:05 | 45:36 -00:36 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 50:11 | 05:35 -00:38 | 50:52 -00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 55:08 | 02:10 -00:01 | 56:27 -01:19 |
| Running 7 | 04:51 | 57:17 | 05:33 -00:42 | 58:37 -01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:37 | 01:02:08 | 04:28 +00:09 | 01:04:10 -02:02 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:06:45 | 05:55 -00:44 | 01:08:38 -01:53 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:11:56 | 04:32 +02:07 | 01:14:33 -02:37 |
| Roxzone | 06:55 | 01:25:22 | 06:17 +00:38 | 01:25:22 |
Molly Andrews performed exceptionally well in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. As an athlete in the 16-24 age category, she ranked in the top 14% of her age group and in the top 8% of all athletes. Her total running time was 00:39:10, which is 05:18 faster than the average time, indicating a strong running profile. This performance, along with her best running lap time of 00:04:38, demonstrates that Molly has a significant strength in running.
However, it was noted that Molly's time in the roxzone was 00:47 slower than average, suggesting that there is room for improvement in her overall fitness and transition times. Furthermore, her pacing at the start of the race from running 1 to 4 was faster than average, indicating a potentially too fast start. This could have impacted her performance in the latter stages of the race where strength exercises are more prevalent.
In the future, Molly should consider implementing the following strategies during her races for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brafman Jess | 2024 London | 01:24:52 | |
| Jaentsch Lena | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:25:51 | |
| Robertson Ava | 2023 Glasgow | 01:25:16 | |
| Withell Kataraina | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:34 | |
| Lee Jeena | 2023 Anaheim | 01:24:58 | |
| Majoor Iris | 2020 Hannover | 01:25:50 | |
| Nelson Samantha | 2022 Dallas | 01:25:29 | |
| Keehan Brittany | 2022 Chicago | 01:25:29 | |
| De Ruiter Silke | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:33 | |
| Dijkstra Anne | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:25:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
