Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Krejci Scott's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Krejci Scott's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Krejci Scott's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Krejci Scott's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 05:10 to 02:53 | 47.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:02 | 05:59 to 04:57 | 21.5% |
| Run Total | 00:41 | 44:03 to 43:22 | 14.2% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:12 to 04:50 | 7.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:41 to 04:28 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:21 to 02:10 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 05:11 to 05:09 | 0.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Krejci Scott | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:47 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:57 | 04:30 +00:11 | 04:47 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 09:38 | 05:07 -00:29 | 09:17 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 05:10 | 14:16 | 03:03 +02:07 | 14:24 -00:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 19:26 | 05:36 -00:06 | 17:27 +01:59 |
| Sled Pull | 05:59 | 24:56 | 05:12 +00:47 | 23:03 +01:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 30:55 | 05:35 -00:05 | 28:15 +02:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:11 | 36:25 | 05:42 -01:31 | 33:50 +02:35 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 40:36 | 05:47 -00:11 | 39:32 +01:04 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 46:12 | 04:54 +00:18 | 45:19 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 51:24 | 05:36 -00:21 | 50:13 +01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 56:39 | 02:17 +00:04 | 55:49 +00:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 59:00 | 05:35 -00:07 | 58:06 +00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:04:28 | 05:26 -00:15 | 01:03:41 +00:47 |
| Running 8 | 07:13 | 01:09:39 | 06:16 +00:57 | 01:09:07 +00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 05:29 | 01:16:52 | 06:54 -01:25 | 01:15:23 +01:29 |
| Roxzone | 07:26 | 01:29:37 | 07:20 +00:06 | 01:29:37 |
Scott's best running lap was 00:04:38, indicating a strong performance in this segment. However, his splits analysis reveals areas where he lost time, primarily in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Rowing, Running 1, Roxzone, and Ski Erg segments. These segments should be the focus of improvement for Scott.
By targeting the areas of improvement mentioned above and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Scott can enhance his performance in future HYROX races. It is important for him to tailor his training routine to address his specific weaknesses and continue to build upon his strengths.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schmidt Jordan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:55 | |
| Stierl Alexander | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:24 | |
| Kanitz Sebastian | 2018 Leipzig | 01:29:50 | |
| Wallis Dave | 2021 Birmingham | 01:29:31 | |
| Harper Justin | 2023 London | 01:29:17 | |
| Bo Jun | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:29:24 | |
| Willesch Alexander | 2023 München | 01:30:04 | |
| Bordas Bastien | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:33 | |
| Hart Michael | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:21 | |
| Malkin Chris | 2024 Birmingham | 01:29:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dallas | 02:28:49 | |
| 2021 Chicago | 01:37:25 | |
| 2021 Austin | 01:32:47 | |
| 2022 Dallas | 01:47:38 | |
| 2021 Dallas | 01:34:57 | |
| 2022 Dallas | 01:29:29 | |
| 2024 Mexico City | 01:41:42 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:50:23 | |
| 2023 Dallas | 01:45:25 | |
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:56:33 | |
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:41:23 | |
| 2024 Dallas | 01:44:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
