Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Drage Phillip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Drage Phillip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Drage Phillip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Drage Phillip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 01:01 | 03:09 to 02:08 | 40.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 05:38 to 05:05 | 21.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 05:24 to 04:53 | 20.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:14 | 05:33 to 05:19 | 9.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:03 to 02:51 | 7.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:53 to 42:53 | 0.0% |
| Drage Phillip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:21 | 00:00 | 04:45 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:21 | 04:29 -00:06 | 04:45 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 04:46 | 09:44 | 05:06 -00:20 | 09:14 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:30 | 02:59 +00:04 | 14:20 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 17:33 | 05:33 -00:19 | 17:19 +00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:24 | 22:47 | 05:07 +00:17 | 22:52 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 28:11 | 05:33 -00:12 | 27:59 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 33:32 | 05:38 -00:05 | 33:32 +00:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 39:05 | 05:43 -00:14 | 39:10 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 44:34 | 04:53 -00:11 | 44:53 -00:19 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 49:16 | 05:35 -00:16 | 49:46 -00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:09 | 54:35 | 02:15 +00:54 | 55:21 -00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 57:44 | 05:33 +00:03 | 57:36 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:03:20 | 05:22 +00:16 | 01:03:09 +00:11 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:08:58 | 06:14 -00:22 | 01:08:31 +00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 05:46 | 01:14:50 | 06:48 -01:02 | 01:14:45 +00:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:19 | 01:28:44 | 07:11 +01:08 | 01:28:44 |
Phillip Drage demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. Falling within the top 38% of all athletes and landing within the top 37% of his age group, this illustrates a strong competitive edge. Interestingly, Phillip showcased a stronger proficiency in running, as evidenced by his total running time being 01:25 faster than the average. This suggests that Phillip's training has allowed him to develop a runner profile. Notably, his pacing throughout the race appeared consistent and well-executed with gradual increases in speed from the first running segment through to the final segment.
Phillip has already demonstrated that he can maintain a consistent pace throughout the race. However, to further improve his performance, he may consider implementing some of the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lux Tobias | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:28:56 | |
| Van Veelen Cédric | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:28:50 | |
| Zbaeda Monder | 2023 Manchester | 01:28:45 | |
| Power Lee | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:21 | |
| Seyer Josh | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:28:52 | |
| Löffler Marcel | 2019 Leipzig | 01:28:22 | |
| Roque João | 2024 Bilbao | 01:28:58 | |
| Murrell Benjamin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:51 | |
| Zwieten Jon | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:16 | |
| Ramirez Sanabria Aarón | 2024 Mexico City | 01:29:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
