Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cua Angelo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cua Angelo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cua Angelo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cua Angelo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:43 | 38:37 to 34:54 | 73.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:26 to 02:01 | 8.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:20 | 04:01 to 03:41 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:17 | 04:20 to 04:03 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:34 to 04:21 | 4.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 03:37 to 03:31 | 2.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Cua Angelo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 04:02 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:50 | 04:13 +00:07 | 04:02 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 08:10 | 04:20 +00:35 | 08:15 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 13:05 | 02:28 -00:02 | 12:35 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 15:31 | 04:38 +00:28 | 15:03 +00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 03:37 | 20:37 | 04:00 -00:23 | 19:41 +00:56 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 24:14 | 04:36 +00:22 | 23:41 +00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:57 | 29:12 | 04:06 -01:09 | 28:17 +00:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 32:09 | 04:44 +00:22 | 32:23 -00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 37:15 | 04:30 +00:04 | 37:07 +00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 41:49 | 04:38 +00:30 | 41:37 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 46:57 | 01:48 -00:12 | 46:15 +00:42 |
| Running 7 | 04:57 | 48:33 | 04:37 +00:20 | 48:03 +00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:01 | 53:30 | 04:06 -00:05 | 52:40 +00:50 |
| Running 8 | 04:41 | 57:31 | 04:58 -00:17 | 56:46 +00:45 |
| Wall Balls | 04:25 | 01:02:12 | 05:09 -00:44 | 01:01:44 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:33 | 01:12:01 | 05:08 +00:25 | 01:12:01 |
Angelo Cua demonstrated commendable performance in the HYROX race in the age group 40-44. His notable achievements include an overall rank of 85, placing him in the top 6% of all competing athletes and a rank of 9 in his age group, which situates him in the top 4% of his peers. His overall time was 01:12:01.
Upon analyzing his performance, it's observed that Angelo started the race strong, with his initial running segment being faster than average. However, as the race progressed, his running times tended to be slower than average, indicating that he may have started too fast. His total running time was slower than the average by 01:50, suggesting that he tends to perform better in strength-based activities than running. This is further supported by his performance in strength-focused tasks such as the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry where he completed faster than the average times.
Angelo should consider implementing the following strategies in his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Obrien Chris | 2023 Barcelona | 01:11:53 | |
| LOPEZ ESTEBAN | 2024 New York | 01:11:43 | |
| Sartori Marco | 2024 Rimini | 01:12:02 | |
| Robinson Jackson | 2024 Brisbane | 01:12:02 | |
| Grissing Stephen | 2024 Berlin | 01:12:25 | |
| Lambert Edward | 2023 London | 01:11:34 | |
| Lesniak Marco | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:11:36 | |
| Kinnard Benjamin | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:12:25 | |
| Tan Wei Bin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:12:11 | |
| Simon Peter | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:12:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:18:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
