Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Beck Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Beck Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Beck Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Beck Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:20 | 40:46 to 39:26 | 50.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:52 to 02:28 | 15.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:35 to 04:15 | 12.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:41 to 04:26 | 9.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 04:40 to 04:30 | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:40 to 04:36 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:19 to 04:16 | 1.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:02 | 05:32 to 05:30 | 1.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Beck Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 04:26 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 05:14 | 04:22 -00:03 | 04:26 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 09:33 | 04:45 -00:12 | 08:48 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 14:06 | 02:45 +00:07 | 13:33 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 16:58 | 05:08 -00:16 | 16:18 +00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 21:50 | 04:39 -00:04 | 21:26 +00:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 26:25 | 05:07 -00:05 | 26:05 +00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:40 | 31:27 | 04:56 -00:16 | 31:12 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 36:07 | 05:16 -00:09 | 36:08 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 41:14 | 04:42 -00:02 | 41:24 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 45:54 | 05:09 -00:05 | 46:06 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 50:58 | 02:05 -00:16 | 51:15 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 52:47 | 05:08 +00:14 | 53:20 -00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 58:09 | 04:48 -00:07 | 58:28 -00:19 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:02:50 | 05:38 -00:02 | 01:03:16 -00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:08:26 | 06:03 -00:31 | 01:08:54 -00:28 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:21:18 | 06:21 +01:09 | 01:21:18 |
Jack Beck delivered an impressive performance in the HYROX 2024 Birmingham event, finishing in the top 25% of all athletes and top 31% of his age group. Jack's overall time was 01:21:18, demonstrating a strong combination of endurance and speed. His total running time was 00:40:46, which was faster by 00:09 than the average time, indicating a stronger inclination towards running. Notably, his best running lap was clocked at 00:04:33.
In terms of pacing, Jack appeared to start slower than average in the first running segment but managed to pick up speed in the subsequent segments, finishing most of them faster than average. This suggests a good pacing strategy, allowing him to conserve his energy for the later stages of the race.
However, the Roxzone segment could be identified as a potential area of improvement. With a time of 00:07:30, Jack was slower than average by 01:16, suggesting that he could work on improving his overall fitness and transition times. Nonetheless, his performance indicates a well-rounded athlete with a slight preference for running.
Roxzone: Jack's Roxzone time was slower than the average, indicating this as an area for potential improvement. To enhance his performance in this segment, Jack could focus on improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition times. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) could be beneficial in improving cardiovascular endurance, and practicing transitions between different exercise zones during training could help reduce time spent in the Roxzone.
Running: Although Jack's total running time was faster than average, there is room for improvement to increase his competitive edge. Incorporating speed drills and interval training into his routine could help improve his running speed and endurance. Emphasizing form, stride length and cadence could also enhance his running efficiency.
Sled Push and Sled Pull: Jack's times in these strength-based segments were slightly slower than average. To improve, he could incorporate more strength training into his routine, focusing on leg strength and core stability. Exercises like squats, deadlifts and planks could be beneficial. Practicing the specific movements of sled pushing and pulling could also help improve his times in these segments.
For future races, Jack should focus on starting at a pace that feels comfortable and sustainable, thereby allowing him to conserve energy for the later stages of the race. He could also experiment with different pacing strategies during training to find what works best for him.
Furthermore, Jack should work on improving his transition times between exercise zones to reduce his time spent in the Roxzone. This could involve rehearsing transitions during training to make them as smooth and efficient as possible.
Finally, incorporating more strength training into his routine could help improve his performance in strength-based segments like the sled push and sled pull. Jack could also benefit from focusing on his running technique to enhance efficiency and speed.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hall Scott | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:06 | |
| Portillo Rasero Edu | 2023 Bilbao | 01:21:06 | |
| Boone Roald | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:21:04 | |
| Chan Perry | 2024 Taipei | 01:21:01 | |
| Vignacq Alexandre | 2023 Paris | 01:20:55 | |
| Johansson Ted | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:07 | |
| Whittaker Paul | 2022 Birmingham | 01:21:05 | |
| Hartsock Josh | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:21:23 | |
| Tegelaar Kevin | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:56 | |
| Grøtterød Martin | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Malaga | 01:17:37 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:42 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
