Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Alen Stef's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Alen Stef's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Alen Stef's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Alen Stef's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:55 | 08:35 to 05:40 | 56.3% |
| Run Total | 01:42 | 46:10 to 44:28 | 32.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:55 to 05:21 | 10.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:57 to 02:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:53 to 05:53 | 0.0% |
| Alen Stef | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:50 | 00:00 | 04:49 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:15 | 04:50 | 04:33 -00:18 | 04:49 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 09:05 | 05:19 -00:01 | 09:22 -00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 14:23 | 03:08 -00:11 | 14:41 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:42 | 17:20 | 05:47 -00:05 | 17:49 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 23:02 | 05:23 -00:19 | 23:36 -00:34 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 28:06 | 05:46 +00:28 | 28:59 -00:53 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:35 | 34:20 | 06:00 +02:35 | 34:45 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 06:04 | 42:55 | 05:58 +00:06 | 40:45 +02:10 |
| Rowing | 04:33 | 48:59 | 04:58 -00:25 | 46:43 +02:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 53:32 | 05:48 +00:06 | 51:41 +01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 59:26 | 02:21 -00:11 | 57:29 +01:57 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 01:01:36 | 05:46 -00:09 | 59:50 +01:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:07:13 | 05:36 +00:19 | 01:05:36 +01:37 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 01:13:08 | 06:33 +00:01 | 01:11:12 +01:56 |
| Wall Balls | 05:53 | 01:19:42 | 07:14 -01:21 | 01:17:45 +01:57 |
| Roxzone | 07:15 | 01:32:41 | 07:42 -00:27 | 01:32:41 |
Stef Alen showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 46% overall and top 49% within his age group. His overall time was 01:32:41, with a total running time of 00:46:10, just 1 second slower than the average, indicating a balanced athlete with both running and strength capabilities. Stef demonstrated particular strength in the Ski Erg and Rowing segments, ranking in the 12th and 6th percentiles, respectively. However, his performance in the Burpees Broad Jump was significantly below average, suggesting an area for improvement. His initial running segments suggest he may have started slower than the average pace but maintained consistency throughout.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fennemore Thomas | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:01 | |
| Rust Stephen | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:09 | |
| Aguilera Barutell Guillermo | 2024 Madrid | 01:33:07 | |
| Mcginn Ben | 2023 Dublin | 01:32:36 | |
| Simpson Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:16 | |
| Kalhöfer Markus | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:33:04 | |
| Wong Wallace | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:32:49 | |
| Brennan Jack | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:55 | |
| Seiberth Kai | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:32:42 | |
| Bonomonte Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:33:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:44:36 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:37:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
