Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Enwright Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Enwright Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Enwright Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Enwright Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:56 | 46:24 to 44:28 | 39.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:22 | 08:11 to 06:49 | 28.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:59 | 06:07 to 05:08 | 20.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 05:47 to 05:21 | 8.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:35 to 04:31 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 03:04 to 03:00 | 1.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:15 to 02:14 | 0.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Enwright Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:03 | 00:00 | 04:48 +01:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 06:03 | 04:33 +00:02 | 04:48 +01:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 10:38 | 05:16 +00:20 | 09:21 +01:17 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 16:14 | 03:08 -00:04 | 14:37 +01:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:57 | 19:18 | 05:46 +00:11 | 17:45 +01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 06:07 | 25:15 | 05:24 +00:43 | 23:31 +01:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 31:22 | 05:44 +00:14 | 28:55 +02:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:37 | 37:20 | 05:58 -00:21 | 34:39 +02:41 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 42:57 | 05:56 -00:16 | 40:37 +02:20 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 48:37 | 04:58 -00:13 | 46:33 +02:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:50 | 53:22 | 05:47 +00:03 | 51:31 +01:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 59:12 | 02:22 -00:07 | 57:18 +01:54 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 01:01:27 | 05:44 -00:13 | 59:40 +01:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:06:58 | 05:34 +00:13 | 01:05:24 +01:34 |
| Running 8 | 05:52 | 01:12:45 | 06:31 -00:39 | 01:10:58 +01:47 |
| Wall Balls | 08:11 | 01:18:37 | 07:13 +00:58 | 01:17:29 +01:08 |
| Roxzone | 05:40 | 01:32:22 | 07:40 -02:00 | 01:32:22 |
Paul Enwright demonstrated a solid performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race, placing in the top 77% of all athletes, and in the top 82% of his age group (30-34). His overall time was 01:32:22, showcasing promising competence in strength-based exercises, while indicating room for improvement in running-based exercises.
His total running time was 00:46:24, which was 00:35 slower than average. This suggests that though Paul has a more strength-oriented profile, improving running speed could significantly enhance his overall performance. It is also worth noting that his pacing seemed to be slightly slower at the beginning of the race, as indicated by the slower times in the first four running splits. However, as the race progressed, his running times improved.
Considering Paul's performance, the following strategies can be implemented for a better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gerlach Christopher | 2022 Berlin | 01:32:35 | |
| Steffensen Erik | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:43 | |
| Hiatt Mark | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:32:00 | |
| Thompson Ryan | 2022 London | 01:31:59 | |
| Bernal Juan | 2023 Malaga | 01:32:44 | |
| Keane Barry | 2024 Berlin | 01:31:54 | |
| Humphreys Brodie | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:53 | |
| Murray Michael | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:32:08 | |
| Watson Chance | 2023 Dallas | 01:32:16 | |
| Hu Yi Ming | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
