Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Varalla Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Varalla Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Varalla Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Varalla Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:09.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Mark Varalla's performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event was commendable, placing him in the top 47% of all athletes and the top 51% within his age group. Notably, Mark demonstrated a strong ability in strength-based exercises, with standout performances in the Sled Push and Wall Balls. His total running time, however, was slightly slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement in his running capabilities. Mark's pacing throughout the running segments suggests a consistent but slightly slower pace, particularly in the early segments where he started slower than average. Overall, Mark appears to have a hybrid profile, with strengths in both running and strength exercises, though there is room for enhancement in his running performance.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time:
The overall running time was 53 seconds slower than average. Focused training on running speed and endurance is recommended.
Training Strategies: Incorporate interval training (e.g., 400m repeats with decreasing recovery times) and tempo runs (sustained effort run at a comfortably hard pace) to build speed and endurance.
Exercises: Hill sprints to improve power and efficiency, and long runs to enhance aerobic capacity.
Sled Pull:
Performance was significantly slower than average. Improvements in upper body strength and pulling technique are needed.
Training Strategies: Focus on exercises that enhance grip strength and pulling power.
Exercises: Incorporate bent-over rows, deadlifts, and rope pulls into strength training routines.
Form Correction: Practice maintaining a low body position while pulling, engaging the core for stability.
Sandbag Lunges:
Performance was slightly below average, suggesting a need for enhanced lower body strength and stability.
Training Strategies: Focus on unilateral leg exercises to improve balance and strength.
Exercises: Include Bulgarian split squats, lunges with added weight, and single-leg deadlifts.
Rowing:
Performance was slightly below average, indicating a need for improved rowing efficiency and endurance.
Training Strategies: Practice rowing intervals with a focus on maintaining a high stroke rate and power output.
Form Correction: Ensure proper technique by engaging the core and driving through the legs.
Race Strategies
Efficient Pacing: Start the race at a slightly faster pace to avoid falling behind early, but remain within a sustainable effort level to avoid burnout.
Optimized Transitions: Focus on reducing time in the Roxzone by practicing quick transitions between exercises during training sessions.
Compromised Running: Practice running immediately after completing strength exercises to simulate race conditions, improving the ability to transition smoothly from strength to running.