Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Essen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire van Harberden Sven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights van Harberden Sven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the van Harberden Sven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve van Harberden Sven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:42 | 39:49 to 38:07 | 44.7% |
| Sled Push | 01:29 | 03:49 to 02:20 | 39.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:39 to 04:02 | 16.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| van Harberden Sven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:26 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:55 | 04:26 | 04:19 -00:24 | 04:18 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 08:21 | 04:37 -00:01 | 08:37 -00:16 |
| Sled Push | 03:49 | 12:57 | 02:39 +01:10 | 13:14 -00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:46 | 04:59 +00:16 | 15:53 +00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 04:39 | 22:01 | 04:25 +00:14 | 20:52 +01:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 26:40 | 04:58 +00:02 | 25:17 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:52 | 31:40 | 04:36 -00:44 | 30:15 +01:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 35:32 | 05:06 +00:13 | 34:51 +00:41 |
| Rowing | 04:19 | 40:51 | 04:38 -00:19 | 39:57 +00:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 45:10 | 04:59 +00:04 | 44:35 +00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 50:13 | 01:59 -00:11 | 49:34 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 52:01 | 04:58 -00:06 | 51:33 +00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 56:53 | 04:32 -00:44 | 56:31 +00:22 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:00:41 | 05:26 -00:04 | 01:01:03 -00:22 |
| Wall Balls | 04:40 | 01:06:03 | 05:42 -01:02 | 01:06:29 -00:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:29 | 01:18:04 | 05:53 +01:36 | 01:18:04 |
Despite his strong performance, there are areas where Sven can further improve to enhance his race performance. Analyzing his splits, it is evident that he struggled in certain segments, including the Roxzone, Run Total, Sled Push, Best Lap, Running 1, Running 3, and Running 5. These segments contributed to the majority of the time lost during the race.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating specific training techniques and exercises tailored to address the identified areas of improvement, Sven can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wakeham Simon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:52 | |
| Davies Aidan | 2024 Dublin | 01:17:35 | |
| Conway Ibar | 2024 Berlin | 01:17:47 | |
| Saile Florian | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:18:13 | |
| Sheldon Michael | 2022 London | 01:18:20 | |
| Duffy James | 2023 London | 01:18:32 | |
| Benko Adam | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:18:13 | |
| Schwerin Adrian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:18:31 | |
| Stel Berry | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:18:32 | |
| Mccormack Sam | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Essen | 01:14:50 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:12:50 | |
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:18:41 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:12:17 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
