Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Vis Kim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Vis Kim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Vis Kim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Vis Kim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:27 | 46:00 to 43:33 | 57.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:53 | 05:02 to 04:09 | 20.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 05:14 to 04:56 | 7.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 05:15 to 05:04 | 4.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:11 to 02:02 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:19 to 05:11 | 3.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 04:25 to 04:20 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:28 to 02:25 | 1.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Vis Kim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:14 | 04:20 | 05:02 +00:12 | 04:59 -00:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:56 | 09:34 | 05:19 +00:37 | 10:01 -00:27 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 15:30 | 02:37 -00:09 | 15:20 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 17:58 | 05:35 +00:34 | 17:57 +00:01 |
| Sled Pull | 05:15 | 24:07 | 05:28 -00:13 | 23:32 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 29:22 | 05:38 +00:20 | 29:00 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:51 | 35:20 | 05:44 -00:53 | 34:38 +00:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 40:11 | 05:45 +00:14 | 40:22 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 05:19 | 46:10 | 05:18 +00:01 | 46:07 +00:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 51:29 | 05:39 +00:31 | 51:25 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 57:39 | 02:11 +00:00 | 57:04 +00:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 59:50 | 05:37 -00:02 | 59:15 +00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:05:25 | 04:33 -00:08 | 01:04:52 +00:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:09:50 | 06:00 -00:03 | 01:09:25 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 05:02 | 01:15:47 | 04:43 +00:19 | 01:15:25 +00:22 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:26:38 | 06:30 -00:33 | 01:26:38 |
Kim Vis delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank of 306, placing her in the top 9% of all athletes. In her age group (25-29), she ranked 71st, which puts her in the top 11%. With a total finish time of 01:26:38, Kim demonstrated a balanced skill set in both running and strength-based exercises. Her total running time was 00:46:00, which was slightly slower than the average, suggesting a slight need for improvement in running endurance. The initial segments of running were notably faster than average, indicating a potentially too fast start that could have affected subsequent running performance. Kim exhibits a hybrid profile with strengths in certain strength segments like Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump, but there is room for improvement in overall running performance and certain strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bienert Sandra | 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:59 | |
| Ball Rebecca | 2022 New York | 01:26:23 | |
| Reynolds Shelly | 2023 Houston | 01:26:13 | |
| Moon Zoe | 2024 Anaheim | 01:26:11 | |
| Bozic Sarah | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:26:59 | |
| Vanderploeg Abigail | 2024 Dallas | 01:26:39 | |
| Cutts Yasmin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:02 | |
| Dahill Sarah | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:26:36 | |
| Churchill Claire | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:55 | |
| Hilgenrainer Lisa | 2019 Hamburg | 01:26:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:28:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
