Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Gemert Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Gemert Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Gemert Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Gemert Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 06:03 to 04:25 | 37.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:28 | 05:50 to 04:22 | 33.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 04:33 to 04:12 | 8.0% |
| Run Total | 00:20 | 39:24 to 39:04 | 7.6% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:50 to 04:35 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:29 to 04:15 | 5.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:59 to 01:52 | 2.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Van Gemert Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:36 | 04:21 +00:08 | 04:22 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 08:05 | 04:42 +00:16 | 08:43 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 13:03 | 02:43 -00:21 | 13:25 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 15:25 | 05:06 -00:01 | 16:08 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:33 | 20:30 | 04:32 +00:01 | 21:14 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 25:03 | 05:04 -00:03 | 25:46 -00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:03 | 30:04 | 04:50 +01:13 | 30:50 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 36:07 | 05:13 -00:11 | 35:40 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 41:09 | 04:40 +00:10 | 40:53 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 45:59 | 05:06 +00:01 | 45:33 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 51:06 | 02:02 -00:03 | 50:39 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 53:05 | 05:04 -00:01 | 52:41 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:50 | 58:08 | 04:42 +01:08 | 57:45 +00:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:36 | 01:03:58 | 05:33 +00:03 | 01:02:27 +01:31 |
| Wall Balls | 05:20 | 01:09:34 | 05:56 -00:36 | 01:08:00 +01:34 |
| Roxzone | 05:21 | 01:20:06 | 06:10 -00:49 | 01:20:06 |
Nick Van Gemert delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 711, placing him in the top 22% of 3118 athletes. He ranked 133rd in his age group, demonstrating competitive prowess within the 35-39 category. His overall time of 01:20:06 was commendable, with a notable total running time of 00:39:24, which was 01:11 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile.
His pacing strategy appeared solid, as he began with a fast Running 1 split (12th percentile), then maintained a consistent pace throughout the subsequent running segments. His performance suggests a runner's profile, given the faster-than-average running times, indicating a need for more focus on strength-based activities.
By honing these areas and implementing strategic race plans, Nick Van Gemert can elevate his performance in future Hyrox events, turning identified weaknesses into newfound strengths.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Benzio Sergio | 2023 Rimini | 01:20:31 | |
| Meyer Alexander | 2019 Leipzig | 01:20:36 | |
| Sciascia Cristian | 2024 Turin | 01:20:14 | |
| Wilcox Andrew | 2023 London | 01:20:11 | |
| Miras Milla Jose | 2023 Madrid | 01:20:22 | |
| Nolan Dean | 2023 Dublin | 01:19:57 | |
| Nicholls Ciaran | 2023 Glasgow | 01:19:38 | |
| Cooney Sen | 2023 Madrid | 01:20:16 | |
| Hughes Shaun | 2024 Perth | 01:19:58 | |
| Crawford Adam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
