Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tremelling Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tremelling Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tremelling Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tremelling Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:13 | 44:11 to 39:58 | 87.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:05 to 02:32 | 11.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:22 to 04:18 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:58 to 03:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:10 to 05:10 | 0.0% |
| Tremelling Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:22 | 04:37 | 04:23 -00:01 | 04:29 +00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 08:59 | 04:47 +00:38 | 08:52 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 14:24 | 02:46 +00:19 | 13:39 +00:45 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 17:29 | 05:11 +00:25 | 16:25 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 23:05 | 04:40 -00:22 | 21:36 +01:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 27:23 | 05:09 +00:33 | 26:16 +01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:37 | 33:05 | 04:58 -00:21 | 31:25 +01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 37:42 | 05:19 +00:24 | 36:23 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:29 | 43:25 | 04:43 -00:14 | 41:42 +01:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:38 | 47:54 | 05:12 +00:26 | 46:25 +01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 53:32 | 02:06 -00:13 | 51:37 +01:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 55:25 | 05:09 +00:24 | 53:43 +01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:58 | 01:00:58 | 04:50 -00:52 | 58:52 +02:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:04:56 | 05:41 +00:19 | 01:03:42 +01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 05:10 | 01:10:56 | 06:07 -00:57 | 01:09:23 +01:33 |
| Roxzone | 05:53 | 01:21:51 | 06:21 -00:28 | 01:21:51 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is clear that Matt's strength lies in the Sled Push and Sled Pull segments, where he performed faster than the average athlete. This suggests that he has good strength and power. However, he struggled in the running segments, particularly Running 2, Running 4, Running 6, Running 5, and Running 7, where he lost significant time compared to the average athlete.
It is also worth noting that Matt's total running time of 00:44:11 was 04:36 slower than the average finisher. This indicates that he could benefit from improving his running performance.
- Transitions: Matt should work on improving his transition time in the Roxzone. This can be achieved by practicing quick and efficient transitions during training sessions. By minimizing the time spent in the Roxzone, he can gain valuable seconds that can make a difference in his overall race time.
- Mental Preparation: Matt should focus on mental preparation before the race. Visualizing success, setting goals, and staying focused during the race can help him perform at his best. Incorporating mindfulness or meditation techniques into his training routine can also help improve his mental resilience and focus during the race.
- Race Strategy: Matt should consider strategizing his efforts during the race. By identifying segments where he is stronger and can potentially make up time, he can allocate more energy and effort to those segments. Similarly, he can identify segments where he typically struggles and aim to maintain a steady pace without losing too much time.
In conclusion, Matt Tremelling had a strong performance in the 2023 Birmingham HYROX race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on improving his running performance, particularly in the identified segments, and implementing effective race strategies, he can further enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Terrance | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:14 | |
| Moreau Quentin | 2024 Marseille | 01:22:17 | |
| Zillén Fredrik | 2023 Stockholm | 01:21:57 | |
| Richter David | 2021 Leipzig | 01:21:56 | |
| Hussey Dan | 2023 Köln | 01:21:26 | |
| Stokes John | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:15 | |
| Watson Andrew | 2022 London | 01:21:36 | |
| Haldina Jakub | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:21:32 | |
| Schlegel Sergi | 2021 Madrid | 01:21:34 | |
| Mccammon Aaron | 2019 Hamburg | 01:22:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:29:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
