Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:08 | 40:34 to 39:26 | 41.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:37 | 06:07 to 05:30 | 22.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 04:31 to 04:15 | 9.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:16 | 04:42 to 04:26 | 9.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:29 to 04:16 | 7.8% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:46 to 04:36 | 6.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:58 to 01:54 | 2.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:30 to 02:28 | 1.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Smith Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:24 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 05:12 | 04:22 +00:07 | 04:24 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 04:41 | 09:41 | 04:45 -00:04 | 08:46 +00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:30 | 14:22 | 02:44 -00:14 | 13:31 +00:51 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 16:52 | 05:08 -00:19 | 16:15 +00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 21:41 | 04:37 -00:06 | 21:23 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 26:12 | 05:07 -00:05 | 26:00 +00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:04 | 31:14 | 04:57 -00:53 | 31:07 +00:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 35:18 | 05:16 -00:02 | 36:04 -00:46 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 40:32 | 04:41 +00:05 | 41:20 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 45:18 | 05:09 -00:01 | 46:01 -00:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 50:26 | 02:04 -00:06 | 51:10 -00:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 52:24 | 05:07 -00:01 | 53:14 -00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 57:30 | 04:46 -00:04 | 58:21 -00:51 |
| Running 8 | 05:25 | 01:02:12 | 05:37 -00:12 | 01:03:07 -00:55 |
| Wall Balls | 06:07 | 01:07:37 | 06:01 +00:06 | 01:08:44 -01:07 |
| Roxzone | 07:22 | 01:21:00 | 06:15 +01:07 | 01:21:00 |
Luke Smith's performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event showcased his strong ability as a runner. His total running time was 15 seconds faster than the average, indicating a solid base of running endurance and speed. However, his initial pacing in Running 1 was slower than the average, suggesting he may have started the race too conservatively. Luke's performance in strength exercises such as the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump was above average, exhibiting a well-rounded athletic profile. Nonetheless, his Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating a need for improved transition and overall fitness.
For future races, Luke should consider a more aggressive start. His performance in subsequent running segments indicates he has the endurance to maintain a faster pace. He should also focus on minimizing rest time in the Roxzone, perhaps by incorporating active recovery techniques. During strength exercises, maintaining proper form and efficient movements can help conserve energy and reduce time. Lastly, practicing transitions between running and strength exercises could help reduce his Roxzone time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maier Sebastian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:20:40 | |
| Lovati Flavio | 2023 Milan | 01:20:53 | |
| Delgado Morales Jose Antonio | 2023 Malaga | 01:21:02 | |
| Vellmer Arne | 2023 Hamburg | 01:20:50 | |
| Mitchell Luke | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:41 | |
| Kaniatobe Tim | 2023 Dallas | 01:21:09 | |
| Finlason James | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:50 | |
| Richards James | 2024 Sydney | 01:21:21 | |
| Paine Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:49 | |
| Fiatte Paul | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:21:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:23:16 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:01 | |
| 2024 London | 02:11:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
