Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Shepherd Mary's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Shepherd Mary's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Shepherd Mary's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Shepherd Mary's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:47 | 50:37 to 47:50 | 78.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:34 | 07:04 to 06:30 | 16.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:28 to 02:17 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:04 to 05:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Shepherd Mary | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:59 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:04 | 05:59 | 05:14 -00:10 | 05:25 +00:34 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 11:03 | 05:46 +00:15 | 10:39 +00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 17:04 | 02:55 -00:09 | 16:25 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:13 | 19:50 | 06:05 +00:08 | 19:20 +00:30 |
| Sled Pull | 05:29 | 26:03 | 06:12 -00:43 | 25:25 +00:38 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 31:32 | 06:06 -00:02 | 31:37 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:04 | 37:36 | 06:52 +00:12 | 37:43 -00:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 44:40 | 06:16 +00:04 | 44:35 +00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 51:00 | 05:31 -00:05 | 50:51 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:26 | 56:26 | 06:10 +00:16 | 56:22 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:02:52 | 02:25 +00:03 | 01:02:32 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:30 | 01:05:20 | 06:09 +00:21 | 01:04:57 +00:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 01:11:50 | 05:14 -00:43 | 01:11:06 +00:44 |
| Running 8 | 07:08 | 01:16:21 | 06:41 +00:27 | 01:16:20 +00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 04:15 | 01:23:29 | 05:31 -01:16 | 01:23:01 +00:28 |
| Roxzone | 08:31 | 01:36:09 | 07:37 +00:54 | 01:36:09 |
Based on her splits analysis, Mary's total running time of 00:50:37 was 03:02 slower than the average. This indicates that she could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time. It's important for her to focus on increasing her endurance and speed to reduce the time spent on running segments.
In conclusion, Mary Shepherd performed well in the HYROX race but has areas where she can improve her performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, she can enhance her overall performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moden Rebecka | 2024 Malaga | 01:35:55 | |
| Peek Brooke | 2023 Dallas | 01:36:34 | |
| Pepper Sharon | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:12 | |
| Hinrich Angélique | 2019 Hamburg | 01:36:07 | |
| Polder Maaike | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:04 | |
| Van Peijpe Olga | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:13 | |
| Rawatan Cindy | 2024 Perth | 01:35:53 | |
| Watts Melissa | 2023 London | 01:36:35 | |
| Orendain Ale | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:04 | |
| Acquistapace Giada | 2023 Rimini | 01:36:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
