Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 759 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ravenhall Carly's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ravenhall Carly's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ravenhall Carly's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ravenhall Carly's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:34 | 08:04 to 06:30 | 40.5% |
| Run Total | 01:30 | 52:15 to 50:45 | 38.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 07:34 to 07:17 | 7.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 05:45 to 05:32 | 5.6% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:48 to 05:38 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:28 to 05:20 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Ravenhall Carly | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:34 | 00:00 | 05:34 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:28 | 05:34 | 05:20 +00:08 | 05:34 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 05:57 | 11:02 | 06:07 -00:10 | 10:54 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 16:59 | 03:08 -00:41 | 17:01 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:17 | 19:26 | 06:29 -00:12 | 20:09 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 08:04 | 25:43 | 06:42 +01:22 | 26:38 -00:55 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 33:47 | 06:31 -00:03 | 33:20 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:34 | 40:15 | 07:31 +00:03 | 39:51 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 06:56 | 47:49 | 06:42 +00:14 | 47:22 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 05:48 | 54:45 | 05:40 +00:08 | 54:04 +00:41 |
| Running 6 | 06:56 | 01:00:33 | 06:34 +00:22 | 59:44 +00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 01:07:29 | 02:31 -00:26 | 01:06:18 +01:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:09:34 | 06:34 -00:08 | 01:08:49 +00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:45 | 01:16:00 | 05:41 +00:04 | 01:15:23 +00:37 |
| Running 8 | 07:43 | 01:21:45 | 07:13 +00:30 | 01:21:04 +00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 04:28 | 01:29:28 | 06:05 -01:37 | 01:28:17 +01:11 |
| Roxzone | 08:53 | 01:42:42 | 08:20 +00:33 | 01:42:42 |
Carly Ravenhall delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, achieving an overall rank in the top 28% and an age group rank in the top 24%. Notably, her total running time was 31 seconds faster than average, suggesting a strong running profile. However, the pacing analysis indicates a slight tendency to start conservatively, as initial running segments were slightly slower than average, followed by a faster pace in later segments. This suggests a potential for improved pacing strategy to maintain speed throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Menconi Sophia | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:42 | |
| Willsmer Carla | 2022 London | 01:43:05 | |
| Haß Miriam | 2019 Hamburg | 01:42:51 | |
| Carrasco Vaz Leyre | 2023 Bilbao | 01:43:08 | |
| Pierce Maree | 2024 Perth | 01:42:52 | |
| Au Ada | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:42:27 | |
| Schuelert Julia | 2023 Hamburg | 01:43:08 | |
| Ting Jocelyn | 2024 Singapore | 01:43:04 | |
| Lau Hei Tung | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:42:12 | |
| Christie Mairead | 2024 Dublin | 01:43:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
