Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Puck Tobias's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Puck Tobias's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Puck Tobias's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Puck Tobias's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:26 | 42:13 to 39:47 | 41.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:37 | 06:11 to 04:34 | 27.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:22 | 06:57 to 05:35 | 23.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 04:45 to 04:19 | 7.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:34 to 01:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Puck Tobias | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:06 | 00:00 | 04:26 -00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 04:06 | 04:23 -00:19 | 04:26 -00:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 08:10 | 04:46 +00:09 | 08:49 -00:39 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 13:05 | 02:45 -00:45 | 13:35 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:34 | 15:05 | 05:09 +00:25 | 16:20 -01:15 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 20:39 | 04:39 +00:06 | 21:29 -00:50 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 25:24 | 05:07 +00:19 | 26:08 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:11 | 30:50 | 04:57 +01:14 | 31:15 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 37:01 | 05:17 +00:15 | 36:12 +00:49 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 42:33 | 04:43 -00:16 | 41:29 +01:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:29 | 47:00 | 05:10 +00:19 | 46:12 +00:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:34 | 52:29 | 02:04 -00:30 | 51:22 +01:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 54:03 | 05:08 +00:02 | 53:26 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 59:13 | 04:49 -00:20 | 58:34 +00:39 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:03:42 | 05:38 +00:28 | 01:03:23 +00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:57 | 01:09:48 | 06:03 +00:54 | 01:09:01 +00:47 |
| Roxzone | 04:37 | 01:21:22 | 06:18 -01:41 | 01:21:22 |
Tobias Puck performed well in the Hyrox race in Hamburg, finishing in the top 8% of all athletes and age group competitors. His overall rank of 58 out of 697 athletes is commendable. However, there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance.
Tobias' total running time of 00:42:13 was 02:49 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he could benefit from improving his overall fitness and reducing his transition time between exercises. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:06 indicates that he has good speed and endurance, but there is room for improvement in other running segments.
In conclusion, Tobias Puck has shown great potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, reducing transition times, and targeting specific areas for improvement, he can further enhance his performance. Incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to address his weaknesses will help him become a stronger and more competitive athlete in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Yamashita Yoshiaki | 2024 Incheon | 01:21:25 | |
| Petrie Simon | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:47 | |
| Jakubowski Dawid | 2022 Hamburg | 01:21:25 | |
| Van Der Ploeg Remco | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:06 | |
| Horstmann Tim | 2024 Berlin | 01:21:21 | |
| Jonkers Robin | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:02 | |
| Derbecque Nicolas | 2024 Paris | 01:21:07 | |
| Azzola Jacopo | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:21:20 | |
| Blackett Philip | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:29 | |
| Logan Lamont | 2023 London | 01:21:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
