Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Price Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Price Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Price Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Price Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:45 | 46:51 to 44:06 | 69.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:11 | 06:28 to 05:17 | 29.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:59 to 02:58 | 0.4% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:53 to 04:52 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:22 to 06:22 | 0.0% |
| Price Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:06 | 00:00 | 04:48 -00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:06 | 04:32 -00:12 | 04:48 -00:42 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:26 | 05:13 +00:04 | 09:20 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:59 | 13:43 | 03:06 -00:07 | 14:33 -00:50 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 16:42 | 05:42 +00:18 | 17:39 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 22:42 | 05:17 -00:19 | 23:21 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 27:40 | 05:40 +00:25 | 28:38 -00:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 33:45 | 05:53 -00:39 | 34:18 -00:33 |
| Running 5 | 06:22 | 38:59 | 05:52 +00:30 | 40:11 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 45:21 | 04:56 -00:03 | 46:03 -00:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 50:14 | 05:42 +00:28 | 50:59 -00:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 56:24 | 02:19 -00:11 | 56:41 -00:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 58:32 | 05:41 +00:30 | 59:00 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:28 | 01:04:43 | 05:32 +00:56 | 01:04:41 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:11:11 | 06:25 +00:19 | 01:10:13 +00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:17:55 | 07:07 -00:45 | 01:16:38 +01:17 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:31:20 | 07:35 -00:25 | 01:31:20 |
Based on the splits analysis, Andrew showed strengths in the Running 1 and Sled Push segments, where he performed faster than the average time by 00:34 and 00:29, respectively. He also excelled in the Ski Erg and Burpees Broad Jump segments, where he was faster than average by 00:11 and 00:16, respectively.
However, there were areas where Andrew could improve. He experienced time losses in the Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Running 4, Running 3, Running 8, Sandbag Lunges, and Run Total segments. To enhance his race performance, Andrew should focus on improving these areas.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Andrew can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races, improve his overall rank, and achieve faster running times.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Paul | 2023 Singapore | 01:30:57 | |
| Dotrimont Stellings Kevin | 2024 Maastricht | 01:31:40 | |
| Mullans Dale | 2024 Glasgow | 01:31:08 | |
| Ferru Nicolas | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:31:05 | |
| Mennetrier Jonathan | 2024 Marseille | 01:31:11 | |
| Kjellström Thomas | 2024 Stockholm | 01:31:44 | |
| Farman Alex | 2022 London | 01:31:36 | |
| Kuipers Djim | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:44 | |
| Counsell Darren | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:31:37 | |
| Strasche Robert | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:31:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:35:58 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:27:38 | |
| 2022 London | 01:23:20 | |
| 2022 London | 01:23:58 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:21:22 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:43 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:57:51 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:59:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
