Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 993 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pilcher Emma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pilcher Emma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pilcher Emma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pilcher Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:57 | 09:33 to 06:36 | 55.7% |
| Run Total | 01:49 | 50:00 to 48:11 | 34.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:32 | 06:31 to 05:59 | 10.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:27 to 03:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Pilcher Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:34 | 00:00 | 05:26 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 04:34 | 05:15 -00:27 | 05:26 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 09:22 | 05:51 -00:07 | 10:41 -01:19 |
| Sled Push | 01:49 | 15:06 | 02:57 -01:08 | 16:32 -01:26 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 16:55 | 06:10 -00:21 | 19:29 -02:34 |
| Sled Pull | 06:31 | 22:44 | 06:18 +00:13 | 25:39 -02:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 29:15 | 06:13 -00:20 | 31:57 -02:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:33 | 35:08 | 06:56 +02:37 | 38:10 -03:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:20 | 44:41 | 06:23 -00:03 | 45:06 -00:25 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 51:01 | 05:33 -00:32 | 51:29 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:21 | 56:02 | 06:17 +00:04 | 57:02 -01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:02:23 | 02:25 -00:10 | 01:03:19 -00:56 |
| Running 7 | 06:33 | 01:04:38 | 06:15 +00:18 | 01:05:44 -01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:27 | 01:11:11 | 05:19 -01:52 | 01:11:59 -00:48 |
| Running 8 | 08:50 | 01:14:38 | 06:48 +02:02 | 01:17:18 -02:40 |
| Wall Balls | 04:31 | 01:23:28 | 05:37 -01:06 | 01:24:06 -00:38 |
| Roxzone | 09:38 | 01:37:30 | 07:47 +01:51 | 01:37:30 |
Emma Pilcher delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race, finishing in the top 23% overall and top 20% in her age group. Her overall time was 01:37:30, showcasing strong capabilities, especially in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push and Sandbag Lunges. However, her total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced running endurance and speed. Emma's pacing started strong, particularly in the initial running laps, but she seemed to slow down in the later stages, suggesting an initial burst of speed that wasn't sustainable. Her profile leans more towards strength, as evidenced by her top percentile ranks in the strength exercises, but she can benefit from balancing this with improved running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dulin Marie | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:37:06 | |
| Langdon Megan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:37:26 | |
| Rudd Mollie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:48 | |
| Lawrie Mairi | 2024 Glasgow | 01:37:10 | |
| Görke Bentje | 2018 Hamburg | 01:37:11 | |
| Smarandache Cristina | 2024 Rimini | 01:37:31 | |
| Witek Alejandra | 2023 Chicago | 01:37:25 | |
| Filipponi Veronica | 2024 Milan | 01:37:27 | |
| Mcdonnell Orla | 2024 Birmingham | 01:37:14 | |
| KlaverkampLee Sora | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:37:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
