Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Neville Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Neville Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Neville Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Neville Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
03:26.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Matthew Neville delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, ranking in the top 48% overall and the top 42% within his age group. Notably, his total running time was 1:15 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, he may have started the race too quickly, as his initial running segments were significantly faster than average, and he gradually slowed down in subsequent running segments. This suggests a need to balance energy expenditure more evenly throughout the race. His strengths lie in running, but there is room for improvement in strength-based exercises and transitions.
Segments to Improve
Burpees Broad Jump: This was the weakest segment, with a time 1:53 slower than average. To improve:
Exercises: Include burpee variations focusing on speed and explosive power, such as burpee tuck jumps and burpee box jumps.
Drills: Practice quick transitions from the floor to a jump, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a consistent pace without resting between reps.
Form Correction: Focus on maintaining a low center of gravity and using the arms effectively to propel the body forward during the jump phase.
Roxzone: The transition time was 59 seconds slower than average, indicating potential inefficiencies.
Technique: Work on minimizing transition time between exercise zones by practicing quick and efficient equipment handling.
Fitness: Incorporate high-intensity interval training (HIIT) to improve overall cardiovascular fitness, allowing faster recovery between zones.
Sandbag Lunges: Time was 53 seconds slower than average.
Exercises: Perform lunges with varying weights and distances, focusing on balance and control.
Drills: Implement unilateral leg workouts, such as single-leg deadlifts and step-ups, to enhance stability and leg strength.
Farmers Carry: Performance was 20 seconds slower than average.
Exercises: Increase grip strength and core stability with farmers walk variations, using differing weights and distances.
Technique: Focus on maintaining a strong, upright posture and controlled breathing to prevent fatigue.
Race Strategies
Energy Management: Avoid starting the race too quickly. Implement a pacing strategy that conservatively approaches the initial segments to preserve energy for later stages.
Transition Efficiency: Practice moving swiftly between exercise zones to minimize roxzone times. Set up equipment in advance when possible and rehearse quick transitions.
Compromised Running: Train for running following high-intensity exercises (e.g., after lunges or burpees) to simulate race conditions and improve performance under fatigue.
Strength and Conditioning: Balance running training with strength workouts to address weaker segments and develop a more well-rounded fitness profile.