Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lokker Margot's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lokker Margot's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lokker Margot's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lokker Margot's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:31 | 49:31 to 48:00 | 48.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:37 to 05:03 | 18.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:47 to 02:17 | 15.9% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:41 to 05:28 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 05:23 to 05:12 | 5.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 06:43 to 06:33 | 5.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:20 to 05:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Lokker Margot | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:12 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:23 | 06:12 | 05:14 +00:09 | 05:25 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 05:52 | 11:35 | 05:46 +00:06 | 10:39 +00:56 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 17:27 | 02:56 -00:15 | 16:25 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:17 | 20:08 | 06:05 +00:12 | 19:21 +00:47 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 26:25 | 06:14 -00:54 | 25:26 +00:59 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 31:45 | 06:06 +00:09 | 31:40 +00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:43 | 38:00 | 06:54 -00:11 | 37:46 +00:14 |
| Running 5 | 06:01 | 44:43 | 06:16 -00:15 | 44:40 +00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 50:44 | 05:32 +00:09 | 50:56 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 56:25 | 06:10 -00:12 | 56:28 -00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 01:02:23 | 02:25 +00:22 | 01:02:38 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 01:05:10 | 06:09 -00:13 | 01:05:03 +00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:11:06 | 05:15 +00:22 | 01:11:12 -00:06 |
| Running 8 | 07:03 | 01:16:43 | 06:41 +00:22 | 01:16:27 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 04:08 | 01:23:46 | 05:32 -01:24 | 01:23:08 +00:38 |
| Roxzone | 08:32 | 01:36:19 | 07:39 +00:53 | 01:36:19 |
Margot Lokker demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Rotterdam HYROX, finishing in the top 16% of all athletes and top 17% in her age group. This indicates a strong overall fitness level and a competitive edge in her category. Margot's total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that while she has a balanced skill set, there is room for improvement in her running efficiency. Her best running lap was significantly faster than her other laps, which could indicate an inconsistency in pacing. Considering her stronger performances in strength-oriented segments like the Sled Push and Wall Balls, Margot appears to have a more strength-oriented profile. However, her slower Roxzone time suggests that transition efficiency and overall fitness could be improved to enhance performance further.
By focusing on these areas for improvement and implementing the suggested strategies, Margot Lokker has the potential to significantly enhance her performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Reißenweber Alexandra | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:36:22 | |
| Drogo Marta | 2023 Milan | 01:36:00 | |
| Gonzales Jazz | 2024 Dallas | 01:36:03 | |
| Carter Emilia | 2023 Glasgow | 01:36:32 | |
| Lecerf Valerie | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:35:52 | |
| Watkins Carys | 2024 London | 01:36:36 | |
| Mcateer Cheryl | 2021 Birmingham | 01:36:31 | |
| Howse Jade | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:27 | |
| García García Alba | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:38 | |
| Lutley Elizabeth | 2024 Rimini | 01:36:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
