Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jeffrey Jordan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jeffrey Jordan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jeffrey Jordan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jeffrey Jordan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:00 | 05:38 to 04:38 | 28.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 02:47 to 02:03 | 20.7% |
| Run Total | 00:36 | 42:15 to 41:39 | 16.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 03:16 to 02:42 | 16.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 05:23 to 04:50 | 15.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:26 to 04:23 | 1.4% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:47 to 04:44 | 1.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Jeffrey Jordan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:49 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:49 | 04:27 -00:01 | 04:36 -00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 08:15 | 04:58 -00:10 | 09:03 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 13:03 | 02:55 +00:21 | 14:01 -00:58 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 16:19 | 05:24 -00:23 | 16:56 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:38 | 21:20 | 04:58 +00:40 | 22:20 -01:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 26:58 | 05:23 -00:13 | 27:18 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:55 | 32:08 | 05:20 -00:25 | 32:41 -00:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 37:03 | 05:33 -00:18 | 38:01 -00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 42:18 | 04:49 -00:02 | 43:34 -01:16 |
| Running 6 | 07:04 | 47:05 | 05:25 +01:39 | 48:23 -01:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 54:09 | 02:11 +00:36 | 53:48 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 56:56 | 05:24 -00:07 | 55:59 +00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:23 | 01:02:13 | 05:06 +00:17 | 01:01:23 +00:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:07:36 | 06:01 -00:06 | 01:06:29 +01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 05:26 | 01:13:31 | 06:32 -01:06 | 01:12:30 +01:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:25:56 | 06:54 +00:15 | 01:25:56 |
Jordan Jeffrey's performance in the 2024 Paris HYROX race showcased an overall commendable performance. He ranked in the top 49% of 1579 athletes and in the top 53% in his age group of 30-34. His overall time of 01:25:56 is a testament to his fitness and endurance capabilities. Notably, he demonstrated significant strength in running, with a total running time of 00:42:15, which was 00:43 faster than the average. His best running lap was timed at an impressive 00:04:48.
Upon reviewing his splits, it appears Jordan started the race at a faster pace than average, which may indicate a tendency to front-load his effort. While this approach can be advantageous, it may have contributed to a decrease in performance during the later segments of the race. His proficiency in running suggests a runner profile, hinting at a potential need to further train his strength exercises for a more balanced performance.
To enhance overall race performance, Jordan could consider implementing the following strategies:
By focusing on these identified areas, Jordan Jeffrey has significant potential for improving his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baroncelli Simone | 2024 Rimini | 01:26:08 | |
| Budziarski Brett | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:45 | |
| Ortiz Michael | 2021 Dallas | 01:26:14 | |
| Troindl Michael | 2024 Milan | 01:25:55 | |
| Brett John | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:26:15 | |
| Metoyer Michael | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:26:02 | |
| Ohara Patrick | 2018 Hamburg | 01:26:26 | |
| Fümel Oliver | 2019 Leipzig | 01:25:53 | |
| Jones David | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:25:34 | |
| Naaktgeboren Jesse | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
