Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 545 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hölk Andrea's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hölk Andrea's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hölk Andrea's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hölk Andrea's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:28 | 56:00 to 53:32 | 57.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:28 | 09:32 to 08:04 | 34.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 05:40 to 05:29 | 4.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 07:13 to 07:05 | 3.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:41 to 02:40 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:43 to 05:43 | 0.0% |
| Hölk Andrea | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:10 | 00:00 | 05:46 -00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:40 | 05:10 | 05:29 +00:11 | 05:46 -00:36 |
| Running 2 | 06:28 | 10:50 | 06:25 +00:03 | 11:15 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 17:18 | 03:21 -01:09 | 17:40 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 07:23 | 19:30 | 06:48 +00:35 | 21:01 -01:31 |
| Sled Pull | 07:13 | 26:53 | 07:14 -00:01 | 27:49 -00:56 |
| Running 4 | 07:36 | 34:06 | 06:52 +00:44 | 35:03 -00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:32 | 41:42 | 08:17 +01:15 | 41:55 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 07:36 | 51:14 | 07:10 +00:26 | 50:12 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 05:35 | 58:50 | 05:49 -00:14 | 57:22 +01:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:47 | 01:04:25 | 06:58 -00:11 | 01:03:11 +01:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 01:11:12 | 02:39 +00:02 | 01:10:09 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 06:42 | 01:13:53 | 07:00 -00:18 | 01:12:48 +01:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:20:35 | 06:16 -01:17 | 01:19:48 +00:47 |
| Running 8 | 08:19 | 01:25:34 | 07:47 +00:32 | 01:26:04 -00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 05:43 | 01:33:53 | 06:42 -00:59 | 01:33:51 +00:02 |
| Roxzone | 10:04 | 01:49:40 | 09:07 +00:57 | 01:49:40 |
Based on the splits analysis, Andrea performed particularly well in the Running 1 and Sled Push segments, where she was faster than the average. This indicates that she has good running speed and strength in pushing the sled. However, she struggled in the Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, Running 4, Running 3, Running 5, Running 8, and Ski Erg segments, where she lost significant time compared to the average.
In summary, Andrea Hölk had a strong overall performance in the 2018 Hamburg Hyrox race, but there are areas where she can improve. By focusing on specific segments such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, and running segments, and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Saw Wenyi | 2024 Singapore | 01:49:15 | |
| Romanuk Anastasia | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:49:30 | |
| Green Hannah | 2024 London | 01:49:29 | |
| Velazquez Jacqueline | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:49:33 | |
| Kubach Barbara | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:49:41 | |
| Wilks Poppy | 2024 Taipei | 01:50:03 | |
| Wigg Katy Innes | 2023 London | 01:49:42 | |
| Ntsoane Theresho | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:49:34 | |
| Farnsworth Laura | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:49:42 | |
| Watson Gill | 2022 London | 01:49:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:53:39 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
