Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 959 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hesslewood Gemma's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hesslewood Gemma's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hesslewood Gemma's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hesslewood Gemma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:06 | 51:30 to 49:24 | 51.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:20 | 06:51 to 05:31 | 32.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:41 | 05:59 to 05:18 | 16.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:14 to 05:14 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:33 to 06:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Hesslewood Gemma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:04 | 00:00 | 05:31 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 06:04 | 05:17 -00:16 | 05:31 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 06:07 | 11:05 | 05:56 +00:11 | 10:48 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:25 | 17:12 | 03:01 -00:36 | 16:44 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 19:37 | 06:18 -00:06 | 19:45 -00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 05:14 | 25:49 | 06:26 -01:12 | 26:03 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:16 | 31:03 | 06:20 -00:04 | 32:29 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:33 | 37:19 | 07:10 -00:37 | 38:49 -01:30 |
| Running 5 | 06:58 | 43:52 | 06:33 +00:25 | 45:59 -02:07 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 50:50 | 05:36 -00:36 | 52:32 -01:42 |
| Running 6 | 06:31 | 55:50 | 06:25 +00:06 | 58:08 -02:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:02:21 | 02:28 -00:20 | 01:04:33 -02:12 |
| Running 7 | 06:22 | 01:04:29 | 06:22 +00:00 | 01:07:01 -02:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:59 | 01:10:51 | 05:24 +00:35 | 01:13:23 -02:32 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:16:50 | 07:05 -00:01 | 01:18:47 -01:57 |
| Wall Balls | 06:51 | 01:23:54 | 05:38 +01:13 | 01:25:52 -01:58 |
| Roxzone | 08:52 | 01:39:29 | 07:59 +00:53 | 01:39:29 |
Gemma Hesslewood demonstrated an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham HYROX competition, finishing within the top 21% of her age category. While she excelled in numerous areas, there are a few segments where improvement is needed.
When considering her profile as a fitness athlete, Gemma's strength stands out more than her running. Her total running time is slower than average, indicating a need for enhanced focus on this aspect of her training. However, it's important to note that her pacing appeared consistent throughout the race, as she didn't start too fast or too slow compared to the average.
Moving forward, Gemma should consider implementing these strategies during her races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Korbel Daniela | 2019 Wien | 01:39:50 | |
| Lu Aria | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:39:51 | |
| CotterellEast Max | 2024 London | 01:39:51 | |
| Marchi Manon | 2024 Köln | 01:39:59 | |
| Waring Evie | 2022 Manchester | 01:39:38 | |
| Murphy Helen | 2024 Dublin | 01:39:19 | |
| Farina Veronica | 2024 Milan | 01:39:28 | |
| Markerink Esther | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:39:26 | |
| Tebi Anne Mariz | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:38:59 | |
| Flores Jennifer | 2023 Chicago | 01:39:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:28 | |
| 2024 London | 01:37:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
