Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Harinck Lars's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Harinck Lars's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Harinck Lars's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Harinck Lars's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:21 | 49:39 to 46:18 | 67.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:31 | 07:37 to 06:06 | 30.5% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:06 to 05:00 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:03 to 07:03 | 0.0% |
| Harinck Lars | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:21 | 00:00 | 05:00 -01:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:21 | 04:36 -00:25 | 05:00 -01:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 07:32 | 05:24 +00:04 | 09:36 -02:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 13:00 | 03:15 -00:39 | 15:00 -02:00 |
| Running 3 | 06:26 | 15:36 | 05:56 +00:30 | 18:15 -02:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 22:02 | 05:37 -01:27 | 24:11 -02:09 |
| Running 4 | 06:14 | 26:12 | 05:55 +00:19 | 29:48 -03:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:37 | 32:26 | 06:21 +01:16 | 35:43 -03:17 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 40:03 | 06:08 +00:09 | 42:04 -02:01 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 46:20 | 05:03 +00:03 | 48:12 -01:52 |
| Running 6 | 08:32 | 51:26 | 05:58 +02:34 | 53:15 -01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 59:58 | 02:26 -00:12 | 59:13 +00:45 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:02:12 | 05:56 -00:04 | 01:01:39 +00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:08:04 | 05:54 -00:29 | 01:07:35 +00:29 |
| Running 8 | 07:32 | 01:13:29 | 06:49 +00:43 | 01:13:29 +00:00 |
| Wall Balls | 07:03 | 01:21:01 | 07:42 -00:39 | 01:20:18 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:16 | 01:36:13 | 08:13 +00:03 | 01:36:13 |
Lars Harinck delivered a commendable performance, finishing in the top 52% of both his overall category and age group in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event. His strong start in the Running 1 segment, where he ranked in the 2nd percentile, showcases his potential for quick bursts of speed. Throughout the race, Lars demonstrated notable strength in exercises such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, indicating a solid strength profile. However, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting room for improvement in endurance running. His pacing strategy shows he might have started too fast, as later running segments were significantly slower compared to the average. Lars exhibits a hybrid profile, with strengths in strength exercises and bursts of speed but a need for enhanced endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chowdhury Shaeed | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:38 | |
| Zambrano Lara Alfonso | 2024 Mexico City | 01:36:11 | |
| Barnsley Ashley | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:49 | |
| Kwok Isaac | 2024 Singapore | 01:36:01 | |
| Chua Asher | 2024 Singapore | 01:36:03 | |
| Berlet Alexander | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:36:19 | |
| Meng Roger | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:54 | |
| Graf Johnny | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:06 | |
| Juckel Hajan Tamim | 2023 München | 01:35:50 | |
| Smith Robert | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
