Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Howard's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Howard's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Howard's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Howard's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:57 | 08:03 to 05:06 | 52.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:11 | 05:18 to 04:07 | 21.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 | 03:08 to 02:18 | 14.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 04:34 to 04:11 | 6.9% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:44 to 04:30 | 4.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:28 to 36:28 | 0.0% |
| Green Howard | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:24 | 04:19 +00:15 | 04:18 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:16 | 08:58 | 04:34 -00:18 | 08:37 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 13:14 | 02:37 +00:31 | 13:11 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:20 | 16:22 | 04:57 -00:37 | 15:48 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 03:52 | 20:42 | 04:22 -00:30 | 20:45 -00:03 |
| Running 4 | 04:20 | 24:34 | 04:55 -00:35 | 25:07 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 28:54 | 04:35 +00:43 | 30:02 -01:08 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 34:12 | 05:03 -00:18 | 34:37 -00:25 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 38:57 | 04:37 +00:07 | 39:40 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 04:40 | 43:41 | 04:57 -00:17 | 44:17 -00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 48:21 | 01:59 -00:14 | 49:14 -00:53 |
| Running 7 | 04:39 | 50:06 | 04:55 -00:16 | 51:13 -01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:48 | 54:45 | 04:30 -00:42 | 56:08 -01:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:06 | 58:33 | 05:24 -00:18 | 01:00:38 -02:05 |
| Wall Balls | 08:03 | 01:03:39 | 05:40 +02:23 | 01:06:02 -02:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:57 | 01:17:33 | 05:51 +00:06 | 01:17:33 |
Howard Green's performance in the 2024 Hyrox Birmingham race was commendable, ranking him in the top 17% of all athletes and top 16% in his age group. His overall time was 01:17:33. Notably, his total running time was faster than the average by 02:51, indicating a strong running profile that significantly contributed to his overall performance. Initial pacing of the race can be improved as the first run segment was slightly slower than average, but he managed to maintain a faster pace in the subsequent running segments.
While Howard's running prowess is evident, there were some segments where performance can be improved:
Going forward, Howard should consider implementing the following strategies during races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cafaro Nicola | 2024 Rimini | 01:17:29 | |
| Soh Hwa Jie | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:17:20 | |
| Dickmeiss Kevin | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:47 | |
| Billes Julien | 2024 Marseille | 01:17:50 | |
| Rottstädt Max | 2023 München | 01:17:05 | |
| Reeker Christoph | 2022 Bremen | 01:17:14 | |
| Kenyon Richard | 2023 Manchester | 01:17:17 | |
| Dallison Kiel | 2021 Birmingham | 01:17:05 | |
| Ryan Evan | 2024 Dublin | 01:17:30 | |
| Mcvitty Keith | 2024 Madrid | 01:17:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:18:51 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:28:26 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
