Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glassborow Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glassborow Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glassborow Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glassborow Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:35 | 07:09 to 04:34 | 44.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:21 | 08:14 to 05:53 | 40.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 05:04 to 04:38 | 7.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 02:50 to 02:36 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 05:13 to 05:03 | 2.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:01 | 02:10 to 02:09 | 0.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:03 to 44:03 | 0.0% |
| Glassborow Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:53 | 00:00 | 05:10 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:13 | 05:53 | 05:08 +00:05 | 05:10 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 11:06 | 05:32 -00:27 | 10:18 +00:48 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 16:11 | 02:46 +00:04 | 15:50 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 19:01 | 05:50 -00:43 | 18:36 +00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 24:08 | 05:51 -01:16 | 24:26 -00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 28:43 | 05:52 -00:27 | 30:17 -01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:14 | 34:08 | 06:14 +02:00 | 36:09 -02:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 42:22 | 06:00 -00:24 | 42:23 -00:01 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 47:58 | 05:25 -00:19 | 48:23 -00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 53:04 | 05:54 -00:26 | 53:48 -00:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 58:32 | 02:16 -00:06 | 59:42 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 01:00:42 | 05:53 -00:33 | 01:01:58 -01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:04 | 01:06:02 | 04:53 +00:11 | 01:07:51 -01:49 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:11:06 | 06:17 -00:05 | 01:12:44 -01:38 |
| Wall Balls | 07:09 | 01:17:18 | 05:01 +02:08 | 01:19:01 -01:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:46 | 01:31:04 | 07:02 -00:16 | 01:31:04 |
Sarah Glassborow demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. She ranked in the top 14% of all athletes, a clear sign of her competitive edge. Her total running time, which was 02:52 faster than the average, indicates she has a strong running profile.
Her consistency in running was evident as she consistently finished her running laps faster than average, indicating her strong endurance and speed. Despite a somewhat slower start in Running 1, she quickly gained momentum in the subsequent laps, showcasing her ability to manage her energy and pace herself effectively throughout the race.
Her strength was most notable in Sled Pull, Running 3, and Running 7 segments where she finished faster than the average. However, there is room for improvement in the strength segments, particularly in Wall Balls and Burpees Broad Jump, where she lagged behind the average.
Based on her performance, Sarah should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kenyon Karly | 2023 Dallas | 01:30:48 | |
| Kammerl Marie | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:30:39 | |
| Woods Jane | 2024 Birmingham | 01:30:34 | |
| Golla Heather | 2023 London | 01:30:51 | |
| Szabados Szilvia | 2022 Essen | 01:30:51 | |
| Hainey Katie | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:30:59 | |
| Nixon Chloe | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:10 | |
| Martynyuk Olesya | 2024 London | 01:31:12 | |
| Neumann Sarah | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:57 | |
| Dunlop Zoe | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:30:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
