Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gascoigne Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gascoigne Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gascoigne Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gascoigne Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:22. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:29 | 07:06 to 05:37 | 44.1% |
| Run Total | 00:48 | 40:46 to 39:58 | 23.8% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 05:06 to 04:38 | 13.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:56 to 02:32 | 11.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 04:45 to 04:37 | 4.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 04:26 to 04:21 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Gascoigne Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:42 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:42 | 04:23 -00:12 | 04:30 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 08:53 | 04:48 +00:04 | 08:53 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 13:45 | 02:47 +00:09 | 13:41 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 16:41 | 05:12 +00:17 | 16:28 +00:13 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 22:10 | 04:41 -00:15 | 21:40 +00:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 26:36 | 05:09 +00:08 | 26:21 +00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 31:53 | 04:59 -00:14 | 31:30 +00:23 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 36:38 | 05:19 +00:05 | 36:29 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 42:02 | 04:44 +00:22 | 41:48 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 47:08 | 05:12 -00:24 | 46:32 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 51:56 | 02:07 -00:14 | 51:44 +00:12 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 53:49 | 05:10 -00:22 | 53:51 -00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:02 | 58:37 | 04:51 -00:49 | 59:01 -00:24 |
| Running 8 | 05:29 | 01:02:39 | 05:42 -00:13 | 01:03:52 -01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 07:06 | 01:08:08 | 06:09 +00:57 | 01:09:34 -01:26 |
| Roxzone | 06:55 | 01:22:03 | 06:20 +00:35 | 01:22:03 |
However, there are areas where Matt can improve to further enhance his performance. His total running time of 00:40:46 was 01:22 slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from improving his running ability. Additionally, his best running lap time was 00:04:42, which was 00:22 slower than the average.
In conclusion, Matt Gascoigne performed well in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve his performance. By focusing on improving his running ability, specifically in segments such as Running 1 and Running 3, as well as working on his wall ball technique and overall fitness, Matt can enhance his performance in future races. Implementing race strategies such as pace management, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lopez Fernando | 2023 Paris | 01:22:05 | |
| Craddock Jack | 2022 London | 01:22:21 | |
| Ociepka Kevin | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:22:28 | |
| Bourbeau Francois | 2024 New York | 01:22:04 | |
| Mcniven Scott | 2024 London | 01:21:48 | |
| Forrester Scotty | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:21:52 | |
| Furkert Dennis | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:22:22 | |
| Lach Marcus | 2023 Hamburg | 01:21:52 | |
| Beardsmore Myles | 2024 Brisbane | 01:22:30 | |
| Hansen Christian | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:22:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
